<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Esmaeili M</submitter><funding>Austrian Science Fund FWF</funding><funding>US National Institutes of Health through the National Cancer Institute</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>Helse Sør-Øst RHF</funding><pagination>1237-1250</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8717862</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>53(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Metabolic imaging using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) has increased the sensitivity and spectral resolution at field strengths of ≥7T. Compared to the conventional Cartesian-based spectroscopic imaging, spiral trajectories enable faster data collection, promising the clinical translation of whole-brain MRSI. Technical considerations at 7T, however, lead to a suboptimal sampling efficiency for the spiral-out (SO) acquisitions, as a significant portion of the trajectory consists of rewinders.&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To develop and implement a spiral-out-in (SOI) trajectory for sampling of whole-brain MRSI at 7T. We hypothesized that SOI will improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of metabolite maps due to a more efficient acquisition.&lt;h4>Study type&lt;/h4>Prospective.&lt;h4>Subjects/phantom&lt;/h4>Five healthy volunteers (28-38 years, three females) and a phantom.&lt;h4>Field strength/sequence&lt;/h4>Navigated adiabatic spin-echo spiral 3D MRSI at 7T.&lt;h4>Assessment&lt;/h4>A 3D stack of SOI trajectories was incorporated into an adiabatic spin-echo MRSI sequence with real-time motion and shim correction. Metabolite spectral fitting, SNR, and Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) were obtained. We compared the signal intensity and CRLB of three metabolites of tNAA, tCr, and tCho. Peak SNR (PSNR), structure similarity index (SSIM), and signal-to-artifact ratio were evaluated on water maps.&lt;h4>Statistical tests&lt;/h4>The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used for statistical testing.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Compared to SO, the SOI trajectory: 1) increased the k-space sampling efficiency by 23%; 2) is less demanding for the gradient hardware, requiring 36% lower G&lt;sub>max&lt;/sub> and 26% lower S&lt;sub>max&lt;/sub> ; 3) increased PSNR of water maps by 4.94 dB (P = 0.0006); 4) resulted in a 29% higher SNR (P = 0.003) and lower CRLB by 26-35% (P = 0.02, tNAA), 35-55% (P = 0.03, tCr), and 22-23% (P = 0.04, tCho), which increased the number of well-fitted voxels (eg, for tCr by 11%, P = 0.03). SOI did not significantly change the signal-to-artifact ratio and SSIM (P = 0.65) compared to SO.&lt;h4>Data conclusion&lt;/h4>SOI provided more efficient MRSI at 7T compared to SO, which improved the data quality and metabolite quantification.&lt;h4>Level of evidence&lt;/h4>1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI</journal><pubmed_title>Whole-Slab 3D MR Spectroscopic Imaging of the Human Brain With Spiral-Out-In Sampling at 7T.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8717862</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2018047</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>J 4124</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 CA211080</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P 30701</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1R01CA211080</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>J 4124‐N36</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Moser P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Andronesi OC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Esmaeili M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Strasser B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bogner W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Z</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Whole-Slab 3D MR Spectroscopic Imaging of the Human Brain With Spiral-Out-In Sampling at 7T.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Metabolic imaging using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) has increased the sensitivity and spectral resolution at field strengths of ≥7T. Compared to the conventional Cartesian-based spectroscopic imaging, spiral trajectories enable faster data collection, promising the clinical translation of whole-brain MRSI. Technical considerations at 7T, however, lead to a suboptimal sampling efficiency for the spiral-out (SO) acquisitions, as a significant portion of the trajectory consists of rewinders.&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To develop and implement a spiral-out-in (SOI) trajectory for sampling of whole-brain MRSI at 7T. We hypothesized that SOI will improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of metabolite maps due to a more efficient acquisition.&lt;h4>Study type&lt;/h4>Prospective.&lt;h4>Subjects/phantom&lt;/h4>Five healthy volunteers (28-38 years, three females) and a phantom.&lt;h4>Field strength/sequence&lt;/h4>Navigated adiabatic spin-echo spiral 3D MRSI at 7T.&lt;h4>Assessment&lt;/h4>A 3D stack of SOI trajectories was incorporated into an adiabatic spin-echo MRSI sequence with real-time motion and shim correction. Metabolite spectral fitting, SNR, and Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) were obtained. We compared the signal intensity and CRLB of three metabolites of tNAA, tCr, and tCho. Peak SNR (PSNR), structure similarity index (SSIM), and signal-to-artifact ratio were evaluated on water maps.&lt;h4>Statistical tests&lt;/h4>The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used for statistical testing.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Compared to SO, the SOI trajectory: 1) increased the k-space sampling efficiency by 23%; 2) is less demanding for the gradient hardware, requiring 36% lower G&lt;sub>max&lt;/sub> and 26% lower S&lt;sub>max&lt;/sub> ; 3) increased PSNR of water maps by 4.94 dB (P = 0.0006); 4) resulted in a 29% higher SNR (P = 0.003) and lower CRLB by 26-35% (P = 0.02, tNAA), 35-55% (P = 0.03, tCr), and 22-23% (P = 0.04, tCho), which increased the number of well-fitted voxels (eg, for tCr by 11%, P = 0.03). SOI did not significantly change the signal-to-artifact ratio and SSIM (P = 0.65) compared to SO.&lt;h4>Data conclusion&lt;/h4>SOI provided more efficient MRSI at 7T compared to SO, which improved the data quality and metabolite quantification.&lt;h4>Level of evidence&lt;/h4>1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-25T22:30:15.395Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T09:03:51.342Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8717862</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33179836</pubmed><doi>10.1002/jmri.27437</doi></cross_references></HashMap>