<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(12)</volume><submitter>Zhu Y</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>A diversity of surgical strategies are used to treat Marfan syndrome patients with aortic disease. We sought to evaluate the long-term efficiency of aortic root replacement (ARR) for patients with Marfan syndrome.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Data were collected from 131 patients with Marfan syndrome and aortic disease who underwent ARR in our center. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term outcomes of these patients, among whom 68 had been diagnosed with aortic aneurysm (AA) and had undergone ARR. The remaining 63 patients had aortic dissection (AD); of these, 35 underwent ARR for limited ascending AD, while the others underwent ARR and total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk (FET). Risk factors for survival and reoperation were identified.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The ope</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of thoracic disease</journal><pagination>6779-6789</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8743404</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Long-term outcomes after aortic root replacement for patients with Marfan syndrome.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8743404</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ma R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xiao Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jian Z</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Long-term outcomes after aortic root replacement for patients with Marfan syndrome.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>A diversity of surgical strategies are used to treat Marfan syndrome patients with aortic disease. We sought to evaluate the long-term efficiency of aortic root replacement (ARR) for patients with Marfan syndrome.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Data were collected from 131 patients with Marfan syndrome and aortic disease who underwent ARR in our center. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term outcomes of these patients, among whom 68 had been diagnosed with aortic aneurysm (AA) and had undergone ARR. The remaining 63 patients had aortic dissection (AD); of these, 35 underwent ARR for limited ascending AD, while the others underwent ARR and total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk (FET). Risk factors for survival and reoperation were identified.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The ope</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-19T20:34:06.678Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T20:34:06.678Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8743404</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35070362</pubmed><doi>10.21037/jtd-21-577</doi></cross_references></HashMap>