<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Brouwer AF</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>243-251</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8748271</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>62(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>A better understanding of how menthol cigarette flavoring and ENDS impact smoking initiation, cessation, and transitions between tobacco products could help elucidate the potential impact of a U.S. menthol ban on combustible tobacco products.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A multistate transition model was applied to data on 23,232 adults from Waves 1-4 (2013-2017) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (analysis was conducted in 2020-2021). Transition rates among never, noncurrent, nonmenthol versus menthol cigarette, ENDS, and dual everyday/someday use were estimated, as were transition-specific hazard ratios for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and income.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Non-Hispanic Blacks who smoked menthol discontinued smoking at a much lower rate than those who smoked nonmenthol (hazard ratio=0.43, 95% CI=0.29, 0.64), but there was no statistically significant difference in the discontinuation rates among non-Hispanic Whites (hazard ratio=0.97, 95% CI=0.80, 1.16) or Hispanics (hazard ratio=0.81, 95% CI=0.56, 1.16). Non-Hispanic Whites who smoked menthol were more likely to become dual users than those who smoked nonmenthol (hazard ratio=1.43, 95% CI=1.14, 1.80). Young adults initiated menthol smoking at a higher rate than older adults (age 18-24 years versus ≥55 years: hazard ratio=2.45, 95% CI=1.44, 4.15) but not nonmenthol smoking (hazard ratio=1.02, 95% CI=0.62, 1.69). There were differences by sex in the impact of menthol flavor on smoking initiation and discontinuation but little difference by education or income.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Sociodemographic differences in product transitions should be accounted for when estimating the potential impact of a menthol ban.</pubmed_abstract><journal>American journal of preventive medicine</journal><pubmed_title>The Impact of Menthol Cigarette Flavor in the U.S.: Cigarette and ENDS Transitions by Sociodemographic Group.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8748271</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U54 CA229974</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Holford TR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mendez D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cook SF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fleischer NL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mistry R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jimenez-Mendoza E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meza R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jeon J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Levy DT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Usidame B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brouwer AF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hirschtick JL</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Impact of Menthol Cigarette Flavor in the U.S.: Cigarette and ENDS Transitions by Sociodemographic Group.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>A better understanding of how menthol cigarette flavoring and ENDS impact smoking initiation, cessation, and transitions between tobacco products could help elucidate the potential impact of a U.S. menthol ban on combustible tobacco products.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A multistate transition model was applied to data on 23,232 adults from Waves 1-4 (2013-2017) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (analysis was conducted in 2020-2021). Transition rates among never, noncurrent, nonmenthol versus menthol cigarette, ENDS, and dual everyday/someday use were estimated, as were transition-specific hazard ratios for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and income.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Non-Hispanic Blacks who smoked menthol discontinued smoking at a much lower rate than those who smoked nonmenthol (hazard ratio=0.43, 95% CI=0.29, 0.64), but there was no statistically significant difference in the discontinuation rates among non-Hispanic Whites (hazard ratio=0.97, 95% CI=0.80, 1.16) or Hispanics (hazard ratio=0.81, 95% CI=0.56, 1.16). Non-Hispanic Whites who smoked menthol were more likely to become dual users than those who smoked nonmenthol (hazard ratio=1.43, 95% CI=1.14, 1.80). Young adults initiated menthol smoking at a higher rate than older adults (age 18-24 years versus ≥55 years: hazard ratio=2.45, 95% CI=1.44, 4.15) but not nonmenthol smoking (hazard ratio=1.02, 95% CI=0.62, 1.69). There were differences by sex in the impact of menthol flavor on smoking initiation and discontinuation but little difference by education or income.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Sociodemographic differences in product transitions should be accounted for when estimating the potential impact of a menthol ban.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-05T09:03:16.252Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T09:03:16.252Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8748271</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34740512</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.amepre.2021.08.007</doi></cross_references></HashMap>