<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Qiu C</submitter><funding>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</funding><funding>Department of Energy</funding><funding>NINDS NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>536-548</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8754657</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>50(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>In C. elegans, PUF proteins promote germline stem cell self-renewal. Their functions hinge on partnerships with two proteins that are redundantly required for stem cell maintenance. Here we focus on understanding how the essential partner protein, LST-1, modulates mRNA regulation by the PUF protein, FBF-2. LST-1 contains two nonidentical sites of interaction with FBF-2, LST-1 A and B. Our crystal structures of complexes of FBF-2, LST-1 A, and RNA visualize how FBF-2 associates with LST-1 A versus LST-1 B. One commonality is that FBF-2 contacts the conserved lysine and leucine side chains in the KxxL motifs in LST-1 A and B. A key difference is that FBF-2 forms unique contacts with regions N- and C-terminal to the KxxL motif. Consequently, LST-1 A does not modulate the RNA-binding affinity of FBF-2, whereas LST-1 B decreases RNA-binding affinity of FBF-2. The N-terminal region of LST-1 B, which binds near the 5' end of RNA elements, is essential to modulate FBF-2 RNA-binding affinity, while the C-terminal residues of LST-1 B contribute strong binding affinity to FBF-2. We conclude that LST-1 has the potential to impact which mRNAs are regulated depending on the precise nature of engagement through its functionally distinct FBF binding sites.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nucleic acids research</journal><pubmed_title>Bipartite interaction sites differentially modulate RNA-binding affinity of a protein complex essential for germline stem cell self-renewal.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8754657</pmcid><funding_grant_id>1ZIA50165</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01NS114018</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 NS100788</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01NS100788</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 NS114018</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Campbell ZT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wine RN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Qiu C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hall TMT</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Bipartite interaction sites differentially modulate RNA-binding affinity of a protein complex essential for germline stem cell self-renewal.</name><description>In C. elegans, PUF proteins promote germline stem cell self-renewal. Their functions hinge on partnerships with two proteins that are redundantly required for stem cell maintenance. Here we focus on understanding how the essential partner protein, LST-1, modulates mRNA regulation by the PUF protein, FBF-2. LST-1 contains two nonidentical sites of interaction with FBF-2, LST-1 A and B. Our crystal structures of complexes of FBF-2, LST-1 A, and RNA visualize how FBF-2 associates with LST-1 A versus LST-1 B. One commonality is that FBF-2 contacts the conserved lysine and leucine side chains in the KxxL motifs in LST-1 A and B. A key difference is that FBF-2 forms unique contacts with regions N- and C-terminal to the KxxL motif. Consequently, LST-1 A does not modulate the RNA-binding affinity of FBF-2, whereas LST-1 B decreases RNA-binding affinity of FBF-2. The N-terminal region of LST-1 B, which binds near the 5' end of RNA elements, is essential to modulate FBF-2 RNA-binding affinity, while the C-terminal residues of LST-1 B contribute strong binding affinity to FBF-2. We conclude that LST-1 has the potential to impact which mRNAs are regulated depending on the precise nature of engagement through its functionally distinct FBF binding sites.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jan</publication><modification>2026-05-08T13:07:55.138Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T16:19:02.123Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8754657</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34908132</pubmed><doi>10.1093/nar/gkab1220</doi></cross_references></HashMap>