<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>57(1)</volume><submitter>Choi SE</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To examine whether quality of dental care varies by age and over time and whether community-level characteristics explain these patterns.&lt;h4>Data source&lt;/h4>Deidentified medical and dental claims from a commercial insurer from January 2015 to December 2019.&lt;h4>Study design&lt;/h4>A retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was a composite quality score, derived from seven dental quality measures (DQMs), with higher values corresponding to better quality. Hierarchical regression models identified person- and zip code-level factors associated with the quality.&lt;h4>Data collection/extraction methods&lt;/h4>Continuously enrolled US dental insurance beneficiaries younger than 21 years of age.&lt;h4>Principal findings&lt;/h4>Quality was assessed for 4.88 million person-years covering 1.31 million persons. Overall quality slightly improved over time, mostly driven by substantial improvements among children aged 0-5 years by 0.153 points/year (95% confidence interval [CI]:0.151, 0.156). Quality was poorest and declined over time among adolescents with only 20.5% of DQMs met as compared to 42.6% among aged 0-5 years in 2019. Dental professional shortage, median household income, percentages of African Americans, unemployed, and less-educated populations at the zip code level were associated with the composite score.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Quality of dental care among adolescents remains low, and place of residence influenced the quality. Increasing the supply of dentists and oral health promotion strategies targeting adolescents and low-performing localities should be explored.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Health services research</journal><pagination>137-144</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8763286</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Measuring the quality of dental care among privately insured children in the United States.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8763286</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kalenderian E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Normand SL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Choi SE</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Measuring the quality of dental care among privately insured children in the United States.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To examine whether quality of dental care varies by age and over time and whether community-level characteristics explain these patterns.&lt;h4>Data source&lt;/h4>Deidentified medical and dental claims from a commercial insurer from January 2015 to December 2019.&lt;h4>Study design&lt;/h4>A retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was a composite quality score, derived from seven dental quality measures (DQMs), with higher values corresponding to better quality. Hierarchical regression models identified person- and zip code-level factors associated with the quality.&lt;h4>Data collection/extraction methods&lt;/h4>Continuously enrolled US dental insurance beneficiaries younger than 21 years of age.&lt;h4>Principal findings&lt;/h4>Quality was assessed for 4.88 million person-years covering 1.31 million persons. Overall quality slightly improved over time, mostly driven by substantial improvements among children aged 0-5 years by 0.153 points/year (95% confidence interval [CI]:0.151, 0.156). Quality was poorest and declined over time among adolescents with only 20.5% of DQMs met as compared to 42.6% among aged 0-5 years in 2019. Dental professional shortage, median household income, percentages of African Americans, unemployed, and less-educated populations at the zip code level were associated with the composite score.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Quality of dental care among adolescents remains low, and place of residence influenced the quality. Increasing the supply of dentists and oral health promotion strategies targeting adolescents and low-performing localities should be explored.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-05T09:05:44.113Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T09:05:44.113Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8763286</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34327703</pubmed><doi>10.1111/1475-6773.13713</doi></cross_references></HashMap>