<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>399(10324)</volume><submitter>Costa Clemens SA</submitter><funding>NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, Sinovac) has been widely used in a two-dose schedule. We assessed whether a third dose of the homologous or a different vaccine could boost immune responses.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>RHH-001 is a phase 4, participant masked, two centre, safety and immunogenicity study of Brazilian adults (18 years and older) in São Paulo or Salvador who had received two doses of CoronaVac 6 months previously. The third heterologous dose was of either a recombinant adenoviral vectored vaccine (Ad26.COV2-S, Janssen), an mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech), or a recombinant adenoviral-vectored ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222, AstraZeneca), compared with a third homologous dose of CoronaVac. Participants were randomly assigned (5:6:5:</pubmed_abstract><journal>Lancet (London, England)</journal><pagination>521-529</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8782575</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8782575</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Valliji Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Nobrega MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dejnirattisai W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Avila Mendonca RN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bittaye M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Franco MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Costa Clemens SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clemens R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pollard AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beveridge A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Queiroz Oliveira IS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mongkolsapaya J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tejpal C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Supasa P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vernon S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Woods D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Freitas Souza BS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>RHH-001 study team</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ramos Souza A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martins Medrado CL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mead G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lambe T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aley P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Voysey M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gonzalez IGS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Moraes Pinto MI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cantrell L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Felle S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Screaton GR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Almeida Mendes AV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davies S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muniz Martins T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sanders H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eldawi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weckx L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Arruda Cordeiro Matos LJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Silveira MBV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bibi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ulaszewska M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>da Guarda SNF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salvador N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mabette R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fraga M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, Sinovac) has been widely used in a two-dose schedule. We assessed whether a third dose of the homologous or a different vaccine could boost immune responses.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>RHH-001 is a phase 4, participant masked, two centre, safety and immunogenicity study of Brazilian adults (18 years and older) in São Paulo or Salvador who had received two doses of CoronaVac 6 months previously. The third heterologous dose was of either a recombinant adenoviral vectored vaccine (Ad26.COV2-S, Janssen), an mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech), or a recombinant adenoviral-vectored ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222, AstraZeneca), compared with a third homologous dose of CoronaVac. Participants were randomly assigned (5:6:5:</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-18T13:44:51.24Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T16:04:20.041Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8782575</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35074136</pubmed><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00094-0</doi></cross_references></HashMap>