<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Rezk-Hanna M</submitter><funding>UCLA Academic Publishing Services</funding><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute</funding><funding>Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of California, Los Angeles</funding><funding>NIH</funding><funding>National Institute on Drug Abuse</funding><pagination>208-218</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8783031</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>161(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Traditional hookah smoking has grown quickly to become a global tobacco epidemic. More recently, electronic hookahs (e-hookahs)-vaped through traditional water pipes-were introduced as healthier alternatives to combustible hookah. With combustible tobacco smoking, oxidative stress, inflammation, and vascular stiffness are key components in the development and progression of atherosclerosis. The comparable effects of hookah are unknown.&lt;h4>Research question&lt;/h4>What is the differential acute effect of e-hookah vaping vs combustible hookah smoking on oxidation, inflammation, and arterial stiffness?&lt;h4>Study design and methods&lt;/h4>In a randomized crossover design study, among a cohort of 17 healthy young adult chronic hookah smokers, we investigated the effect of e-hookah v</pubmed_abstract><journal>Chest</journal><pubmed_title>Differential Effects of Electronic Hookah Vaping and Traditional Combustible Hookah Smoking on Oxidation, Inflammation, and Arterial Stiffness.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8783031</pmcid><funding_grant_id>UL1TR000124</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 DA012393</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR000124</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 HL145002</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1R21HL145002-01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 DA12393</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Gupta R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dobrin D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rezk-Hanna M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cheng CW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nettle CO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tashkin DP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brecht ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Means A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Araujo JA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Differential Effects of Electronic Hookah Vaping and Traditional Combustible Hookah Smoking on Oxidation, Inflammation, and Arterial Stiffness.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Traditional hookah smoking has grown quickly to become a global tobacco epidemic. More recently, electronic hookahs (e-hookahs)-vaped through traditional water pipes-were introduced as healthier alternatives to combustible hookah. With combustible tobacco smoking, oxidative stress, inflammation, and vascular stiffness are key components in the development and progression of atherosclerosis. The comparable effects of hookah are unknown.&lt;h4>Research question&lt;/h4>What is the differential acute effect of e-hookah vaping vs combustible hookah smoking on oxidation, inflammation, and arterial stiffness?&lt;h4>Study design and methods&lt;/h4>In a randomized crossover design study, among a cohort of 17 healthy young adult chronic hookah smokers, we investigated the effect of e-hookah v</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-05T07:13:17.588Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T15:37:42.517Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8783031</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34298007</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.027</doi></cross_references></HashMap>