<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Griguer CE</submitter><funding>National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke</funding><funding>NINDS NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>vdab186</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8788017</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>4(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Glioblastoma (GBM) has a 5-year survival rate of 3%-5%. GBM treatment includes maximal resection followed by radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Cytochrome C oxidase (CcO) is a mitochondrial enzyme involved in the mechanism of resistance to TMZ. In a prior retrospective trial, CcO activity in GBMs inversely correlated with clinical outcome. The current Cyto-C study was designed to prospectively evaluate and validate the prognostic value of tumor CcO activity in patients with newly diagnosed primary GBM, and compared to the known prognostic value of &lt;i>MGMT&lt;/i> promoter methylation status.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This multi-institutional, blinded, prospective biomarker study enrolled 152 patients with newly diagnosed GBM who were to undergo surgical resection and would be candidates for standard of care. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) time, and the secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) time. Tumor CcO activity and &lt;i>MGMT&lt;/i> promoter methylation status were assayed in a centralized laboratory.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>OS and PFS did not differ by high or low tumor CcO activity, and the prognostic validity of &lt;i>MGMT&lt;/i> promoter methylation was confirmed. Notably, a planned exploratory analysis suggested that the combination of low CcO activity and &lt;i>MGMT&lt;/i> promoter methylation in tumors may be predictive of long-term survival.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Tumor CcO activity alone was not confirmed as a prognostic marker in GBM patients. However, the combination of low CcO activity and methylated &lt;i>MGMT&lt;/i> promoter may reveal a subgroup of GBM patients with improved long-term survival that warrants further evaluation. Our work also demonstrates the importance of performing large, multi-institutional, prospective studies to validate biomarkers. We also discuss lessons learned in assembling such studies.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Neuro-oncology advances</journal><pubmed_title>Prospective biomarker study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Cyto-C clinical trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8788017</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U24 NS107128</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 NS093663</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 NS077179</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 NS077352</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24 NS107166</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Dogan A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McNeill K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Benge M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fedler JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chaudhary R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salacz M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Conwit RA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gerstner E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coffey CS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Drappatz J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Markert J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oliva CR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marder K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Neill-Hudson TM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cudkowicz ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Graber J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Colman H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ecklund DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nabors LB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kowalska A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hackney JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chheda MG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Puduvalli V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mohile N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de la Fuente M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kreisl T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gudjonsdottir AL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kumthekar P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Griguer CE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leonard TP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chase M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clark S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Prospective biomarker study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Cyto-C clinical trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Glioblastoma (GBM) has a 5-year survival rate of 3%-5%. GBM treatment includes maximal resection followed by radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Cytochrome C oxidase (CcO) is a mitochondrial enzyme involved in the mechanism of resistance to TMZ. In a prior retrospective trial, CcO activity in GBMs inversely correlated with clinical outcome. The current Cyto-C study was designed to prospectively evaluate and validate the prognostic value of tumor CcO activity in patients with newly diagnosed primary GBM, and compared to the known prognostic value of &lt;i>MGMT&lt;/i> promoter methylation status.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This multi-institutional, blinded, prospective biomarker study enrolled 152 patients with newly diagnosed GBM who were to undergo surgical resection and would be candidates for standard of care. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) time, and the secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) time. Tumor CcO activity and &lt;i>MGMT&lt;/i> promoter methylation status were assayed in a centralized laboratory.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>OS and PFS did not differ by high or low tumor CcO activity, and the prognostic validity of &lt;i>MGMT&lt;/i> promoter methylation was confirmed. Notably, a planned exploratory analysis suggested that the combination of low CcO activity and &lt;i>MGMT&lt;/i> promoter methylation in tumors may be predictive of long-term survival.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Tumor CcO activity alone was not confirmed as a prognostic marker in GBM patients. However, the combination of low CcO activity and methylated &lt;i>MGMT&lt;/i> promoter may reveal a subgroup of GBM patients with improved long-term survival that warrants further evaluation. Our work also demonstrates the importance of performing large, multi-institutional, prospective studies to validate biomarkers. We also discuss lessons learned in assembling such studies.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jan-Dec</publication><modification>2024-11-20T16:58:35.555Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T15:50:09.454Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8788017</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35088051</pubmed><doi>10.1093/noajnl/vdab186</doi></cross_references></HashMap>