<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>27(4)</volume><submitter>Pallett SJ</submitter><funding>Wellcome Trust</funding><funding>Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council</funding><pubmed_abstract>IntroductionImmunoassays targeting different SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies are employed for seroprevalence studies. The degree of variability between immunoassays targeting anti-nucleocapsid (anti-NP; the majority) vs the potentially neutralising anti-spike antibodies (including anti-receptor-binding domain; anti-RBD), particularly in mild or asymptomatic disease, remains unclear.AimsWe aimed to explore variability in anti-NP and anti-RBD antibody detectability following mild symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and analyse antibody response for correlation with symptomatology.MethodsA multicentre prospective cross-sectional study was undertaken (April-July 2020). Paired serum samples were tested for anti-NP and anti-RBD IgG antibodies and reactivity expressed as binding ratio</pubmed_abstract><journal>Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin</journal><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8796290</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Variability in detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses following mild infection: a prospective multicentre cross-sectional study, London, United Kingdom, 17 April to 17 July 2020.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8796290</pmcid><funding_grant_id>EP/N002474/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>209411/Z/17/Z</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>EP/M027007/1</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Denny SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pantelidis P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McClure MO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Randell P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abdulaal A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rayment M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moore LS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Shea MK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pallett SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pallett MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Toumazou C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rosadas de Oliveira C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khan M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jones R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tedder R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davies GW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mughal N</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Variability in detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses following mild infection: a prospective multicentre cross-sectional study, London, United Kingdom, 17 April to 17 July 2020.</name><description>IntroductionImmunoassays targeting different SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies are employed for seroprevalence studies. The degree of variability between immunoassays targeting anti-nucleocapsid (anti-NP; the majority) vs the potentially neutralising anti-spike antibodies (including anti-receptor-binding domain; anti-RBD), particularly in mild or asymptomatic disease, remains unclear.AimsWe aimed to explore variability in anti-NP and anti-RBD antibody detectability following mild symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and analyse antibody response for correlation with symptomatology.MethodsA multicentre prospective cross-sectional study was undertaken (April-July 2020). Paired serum samples were tested for anti-NP and anti-RBD IgG antibodies and reactivity expressed as binding ratio</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-04T08:41:29.796Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T08:41:29.796Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8796290</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35086612</pubmed><doi>10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.4.2002076</doi></cross_references></HashMap>