<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(1)</volume><submitter>Kawamura R</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Automated medical history-taking systems that generate differential diagnosis lists have been suggested to contribute to improved diagnostic accuracy. However, the effect of these systems on diagnostic errors in clinical practice remains unknown.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study aimed to assess the incidence of diagnostic errors in an outpatient department, where an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven automated medical history-taking system that generates differential diagnosis lists was implemented in clinical practice.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from a community hospital in Japan. We included patients aged 20 years and older who used an AI-driven, automated medical history-taking system that generates differential diagnosis li</pubmed_abstract><journal>JMIR medical informatics</journal><pagination>e35225</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8832260</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Incidence of Diagnostic Errors Among Unexpectedly Hospitalized Patients Using an Automated Medical History-Taking System With a Differential Diagnosis Generator: Retrospective Observational Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8832260</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Harada Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sugimoto S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shimizu T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kawamura R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nagase Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Katsukura S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Incidence of Diagnostic Errors Among Unexpectedly Hospitalized Patients Using an Automated Medical History-Taking System With a Differential Diagnosis Generator: Retrospective Observational Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Automated medical history-taking systems that generate differential diagnosis lists have been suggested to contribute to improved diagnostic accuracy. However, the effect of these systems on diagnostic errors in clinical practice remains unknown.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study aimed to assess the incidence of diagnostic errors in an outpatient department, where an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven automated medical history-taking system that generates differential diagnosis lists was implemented in clinical practice.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from a community hospital in Japan. We included patients aged 20 years and older who used an AI-driven, automated medical history-taking system that generates differential diagnosis li</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-22T07:48:55.146Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T22:16:09.698Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8832260</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35084347</pubmed><doi>10.2196/35225</doi></cross_references></HashMap>