<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Solimando AG</submitter><funding>Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro</funding><funding>Regione Puglia</funding><funding>Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro</funding><pagination>65-74</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8863772</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>22(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background &amp; aims&lt;/h4>A plethora of second-line therapies have been recently introduced for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment with promising results. A meta-analysis of second-line treatments for HCC has been performed to better tailor their use based on improved patient stratification and to identify the best available option.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating second-line treatment for advanced HCC in patients already treated with sorafenib. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and drug withdrawal due to adverse events. Network meta-analyses were performed considering placebo as the basis for comparison in efficacy and s</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical and experimental medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Second-line treatments for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8863772</pmcid><funding_grant_id>20441</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>De Re V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krebs M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nanni O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vacca A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Petracci E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fasano R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Argentiero A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brunetti O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Solimando AG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Susca N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Racanelli V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Azzali I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Silvestris N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leone P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Second-line treatments for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background &amp; aims&lt;/h4>A plethora of second-line therapies have been recently introduced for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment with promising results. A meta-analysis of second-line treatments for HCC has been performed to better tailor their use based on improved patient stratification and to identify the best available option.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating second-line treatment for advanced HCC in patients already treated with sorafenib. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and drug withdrawal due to adverse events. Network meta-analyses were performed considering placebo as the basis for comparison in efficacy and s</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Feb</publication><modification>2026-06-19T04:51:28.59Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T03:26:19.325Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8863772</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34146196</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s10238-021-00727-7</doi></cross_references></HashMap>