<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Beck ED</submitter><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institute on Aging</funding><pagination>523-553</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8867745</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>122(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Decades of studies identify personality traits as prospectively associated with life outcomes. However, previous investigations of personality characteristic-outcome associations have not taken a principled approach to covariate use or other sampling strategies to ensure the robustness of personality-outcome associations. The result is that it is unclear (a) whether personality characteristics are associated with important outcomes after accounting for a range of background variables, (b) for whom and when personality-outcome associations hold, and (c) that background variables are most important to account for. The present study examines the robustness and boundary conditions of personality-outcome associations using prospective Big Five associations with 14 health, social, education/work</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of personality and social psychology</journal><pubmed_title>A mega-analysis of personality prediction: Robustness and boundary conditions.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8867745</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 AG018436</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 AG00030-3; 5R01AG067622-02; 5R01AG018436-20</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 AG000030</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG067622</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Beck ED</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jackson JJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A mega-analysis of personality prediction: Robustness and boundary conditions.</name><description>Decades of studies identify personality traits as prospectively associated with life outcomes. However, previous investigations of personality characteristic-outcome associations have not taken a principled approach to covariate use or other sampling strategies to ensure the robustness of personality-outcome associations. The result is that it is unclear (a) whether personality characteristics are associated with important outcomes after accounting for a range of background variables, (b) for whom and when personality-outcome associations hold, and (c) that background variables are most important to account for. The present study examines the robustness and boundary conditions of personality-outcome associations using prospective Big Five associations with 14 health, social, education/work</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-19T22:05:10.581Z</modification><creation>2024-11-11T18:59:28.404Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8867745</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35157487</pubmed><doi>10.1037/pspp0000386</doi></cross_references></HashMap>