<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Vohra SN</submitter><funding>Komen Graduate Training in Disparities Research Grant</funding><funding>UNC Cancer Control Education Program</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>University Cancer Research Fund of North Carolina, the Komen Graduate Training in Disparities Research</funding><funding>NIH</funding><funding>NCI NIH</funding><funding>University Cancer Research Fund of North Carolina and Susan G. Komen for the Cure</funding><pagination>561-568</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8901538</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>31(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Breast cancers in recently postpartum women may have worse outcomes, but studies examining tumor molecular features by pregnancy recency have shown conflicting results.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This analysis used Carolina Breast Cancer Study data to examine clinical and molecular tumor features among women less than 50 years of age who were recently (≤10 years prior) or remotely (>10 years prior) postpartum, or nulliparous. Prevalence odds ratios (POR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multivariable models.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Recently postpartum women (N = 618) were more frequently lymph node-positive [POR (95% CI): 1.66 (1.26-2.19)], estrogen receptor (ER)-negative [1.37 (1.02-1.83)], and IHC-based triple negative [1.57 (1.00-2.47)] compared with nulliparous (N =</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology</journal><pubmed_title>Molecular and Clinical Characterization of Postpartum-Associated Breast Cancer in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study Phase I-III, 1993-2013.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8901538</pmcid><funding_grant_id>T32CA057726</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>OGUNC1202</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30CA016086</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 CA058223</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 CA057726</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA016086</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>GTDR16381071</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50-CA58223</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01 CA151135</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01CA151135</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Sherman ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schedin P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamilton AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Troester MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walens A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Love MI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nichols HB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olshan AF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vohra SN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reeder-Hayes KE</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Molecular and Clinical Characterization of Postpartum-Associated Breast Cancer in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study Phase I-III, 1993-2013.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Breast cancers in recently postpartum women may have worse outcomes, but studies examining tumor molecular features by pregnancy recency have shown conflicting results.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This analysis used Carolina Breast Cancer Study data to examine clinical and molecular tumor features among women less than 50 years of age who were recently (≤10 years prior) or remotely (>10 years prior) postpartum, or nulliparous. Prevalence odds ratios (POR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multivariable models.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Recently postpartum women (N = 618) were more frequently lymph node-positive [POR (95% CI): 1.66 (1.26-2.19)], estrogen receptor (ER)-negative [1.37 (1.02-1.83)], and IHC-based triple negative [1.57 (1.00-2.47)] compared with nulliparous (N =</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-22T09:59:53.082Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T23:24:15.148Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8901538</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34810211</pubmed><doi>10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0940</doi><doi>10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0940</doi></cross_references></HashMap>