<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>376</volume><submitter>Harding C</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To test and compare the efficacy of methenamine hippurate for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections with the current standard prophylaxis of daily low dose antibiotics.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Multicentre, open label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Eight centres in the UK, recruiting from June 2016 to June 2018.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Women aged ≥18 years with recurrent urinary tract infections, requiring prophylactic treatment.&lt;h4>Interventions&lt;/h4>Random assignment (1:1, using permuted blocks of variable length via a web based system) to receive antibiotic prophylaxis or methenamine hippurate for 12 months. Treatment allocation was not masked and crossover between arms was allowed.&lt;h4>Main outcome measure&lt;/h4>Absolute difference in incidence of symptoma</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ (Clinical research ed.)</journal><pagination>e068229</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8905684</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Alternative to prophylactic antibiotics for the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: multicentre, open label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8905684</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Carnell S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thiruchelvam N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abouhajar A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hussain Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eardley I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harding C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pickard R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lecouturier J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Watson G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Currer S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>King W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walton K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guerrero K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lazarowicz H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ali A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vale L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Forbes R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chadwick T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Homer T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mossop H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pearce I</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Alternative to prophylactic antibiotics for the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: multicentre, open label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To test and compare the efficacy of methenamine hippurate for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections with the current standard prophylaxis of daily low dose antibiotics.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Multicentre, open label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Eight centres in the UK, recruiting from June 2016 to June 2018.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Women aged ≥18 years with recurrent urinary tract infections, requiring prophylactic treatment.&lt;h4>Interventions&lt;/h4>Random assignment (1:1, using permuted blocks of variable length via a web based system) to receive antibiotic prophylaxis or methenamine hippurate for 12 months. Treatment allocation was not masked and crossover between arms was allowed.&lt;h4>Main outcome measure&lt;/h4>Absolute difference in incidence of symptoma</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-21T23:10:27.186Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T19:06:32.915Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8905684</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35264408</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmj-2021-0068229</doi></cross_references></HashMap>