<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12</volume><submitter>Jin Y</submitter><pubmed_abstract>The taxonomy of the genus &lt;i>Neisseria&lt;/i> remains confusing, particularly regarding &lt;i>Neisseria mucosa&lt;/i> and &lt;i>Neisseria sicca.&lt;/i> In 2012, ribosomal multi-locus sequence typing reclassified both as &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i>, but data concerning 17 &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> strains remain available in GenBank. The continuous progress of high-throughput sequencing has facilitated ready accessibility of whole-genome data, promoting vigorous development of average nucleotide identity (ANI) and high-resolution phylogenetic analysis. Here, we report that a &lt;i>Neisseria&lt;/i> isolate, which caused native-valve endocarditis and multiple embolic brain infarcts in a patient with congenital heart disease, was misidentified as &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> by VITEK MS. This isolate was reclassified as &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> by ANI blast (ANIb) and by phylogenetic analysis using whole-genome data yielded by the PacBio Sequel and Illumina NovaSeq PE150 platforms. The confusion evident in the GenBank and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) databases suggests that &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 13) and &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 16) in GenBank should be reclassified using ANIb and high-resolution phylogenetic analysis. The whole-genome data of 30 strains (including the clinical isolate) were compared with the data of 27 type &lt;i>Neisseria&lt;/i> strains (including one &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> and two &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> type strains) as a genomic index. In total, 25 (8 originally identified as &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> and 17 originally identified as &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i>) and 7 (1 originally identified as &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> and 6 originally identified as &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i>) strains were reclassified into the &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> and &lt;i>Neisseria subflava&lt;/i> groups, respectively; 1 residual &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> strain was reclassified as &lt;i>Neisseria meningitidis&lt;/i>. In conclusion, a combination of ANIb and robust phylogenetic analysis reclassified strains originally identified as &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> and &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> into (principally) the &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> group and the &lt;i>N. subflava&lt;/i> group. The misclassified &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> and &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> strains in the GenBank and MALDI-TOF MS databases were supposed to be corrected. Updated genomic classification strategy for originally identified &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> and &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> strains was recommended to be adopted in GenBank.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in microbiology</journal><pagination>780183</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8909641</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Confirmation of the Need for Reclassification of &lt;i>Neisseria mucosa&lt;/i> and &lt;i>Neisseria sicca&lt;/i> Using Average Nucleotide Identity Blast and Phylogenetic Analysis of Whole-Genome Sequencing: Hinted by Clinical Misclassification of a &lt;i>Neisseria mucosa&lt;/i> Strain.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8909641</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Gu B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zheng B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yao Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jin Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yu X</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Confirmation of the Need for Reclassification of &lt;i>Neisseria mucosa&lt;/i> and &lt;i>Neisseria sicca&lt;/i> Using Average Nucleotide Identity Blast and Phylogenetic Analysis of Whole-Genome Sequencing: Hinted by Clinical Misclassification of a &lt;i>Neisseria mucosa&lt;/i> Strain.</name><description>The taxonomy of the genus &lt;i>Neisseria&lt;/i> remains confusing, particularly regarding &lt;i>Neisseria mucosa&lt;/i> and &lt;i>Neisseria sicca.&lt;/i> In 2012, ribosomal multi-locus sequence typing reclassified both as &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i>, but data concerning 17 &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> strains remain available in GenBank. The continuous progress of high-throughput sequencing has facilitated ready accessibility of whole-genome data, promoting vigorous development of average nucleotide identity (ANI) and high-resolution phylogenetic analysis. Here, we report that a &lt;i>Neisseria&lt;/i> isolate, which caused native-valve endocarditis and multiple embolic brain infarcts in a patient with congenital heart disease, was misidentified as &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> by VITEK MS. This isolate was reclassified as &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> by ANI blast (ANIb) and by phylogenetic analysis using whole-genome data yielded by the PacBio Sequel and Illumina NovaSeq PE150 platforms. The confusion evident in the GenBank and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) databases suggests that &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 13) and &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 16) in GenBank should be reclassified using ANIb and high-resolution phylogenetic analysis. The whole-genome data of 30 strains (including the clinical isolate) were compared with the data of 27 type &lt;i>Neisseria&lt;/i> strains (including one &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> and two &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> type strains) as a genomic index. In total, 25 (8 originally identified as &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> and 17 originally identified as &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i>) and 7 (1 originally identified as &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> and 6 originally identified as &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i>) strains were reclassified into the &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> and &lt;i>Neisseria subflava&lt;/i> groups, respectively; 1 residual &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> strain was reclassified as &lt;i>Neisseria meningitidis&lt;/i>. In conclusion, a combination of ANIb and robust phylogenetic analysis reclassified strains originally identified as &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> and &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> into (principally) the &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> group and the &lt;i>N. subflava&lt;/i> group. The misclassified &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> and &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> strains in the GenBank and MALDI-TOF MS databases were supposed to be corrected. Updated genomic classification strategy for originally identified &lt;i>N. mucosa&lt;/i> and &lt;i>N. sicca&lt;/i> strains was recommended to be adopted in GenBank.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021</publication><modification>2026-05-30T20:48:57.853Z</modification><creation>2024-11-09T11:56:25.318Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8909641</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35281306</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fmicb.2021.780183</doi></cross_references></HashMap>