<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(3)</volume><submitter>Ng A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>Efforts to understand the factors influencing the uptake of reproductive, maternal, newborn, child health and nutrition (RMNCH&amp;N) services in high disease burden low-resource settings have often focused on face-to-face surveys or direct observations of service delivery. Increasing access to mobile phones has led to growing interest in phone surveys as a rapid, low-cost alternatives to face-to-face surveys. We assess determinants of RMNCH&amp;N knowledge among pregnant women with access to phones and examine the reliability of alternative modalities of survey delivery.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Women 5-7 months pregnant with access to a phone.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Four districts of Madhya Pradesh, India.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Cross-sectional surveys administered face-to-face and within 2 weeks, </pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pagination>e056076</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8915337</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Assessing the reliability of phone surveys to measure reproductive, maternal and child health knowledge among pregnant women in rural India: a feasibility study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8915337</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Shah N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miller M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Agarwal S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tiffin N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dhar D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kumar N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ved R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scott K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chamberlain S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shinde A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dutt P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mendiratta J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bhatanagar A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weiss F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chandra R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moodley D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mitra R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ng A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Penugonda N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bhatnagar A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gopalakrishnan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Honikman S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dumke N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mohan D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chakraborty A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singh A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Godfrey A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arora S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Whitehead S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Labrique A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ummer O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kilkari Impact Evaluation Team</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Parida D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mulder N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bashingwa JJH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>LeFevre AE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rahul S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rajput S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>LeFevre A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Assessing the reliability of phone surveys to measure reproductive, maternal and child health knowledge among pregnant women in rural India: a feasibility study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>Efforts to understand the factors influencing the uptake of reproductive, maternal, newborn, child health and nutrition (RMNCH&amp;N) services in high disease burden low-resource settings have often focused on face-to-face surveys or direct observations of service delivery. Increasing access to mobile phones has led to growing interest in phone surveys as a rapid, low-cost alternatives to face-to-face surveys. We assess determinants of RMNCH&amp;N knowledge among pregnant women with access to phones and examine the reliability of alternative modalities of survey delivery.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Women 5-7 months pregnant with access to a phone.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Four districts of Madhya Pradesh, India.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Cross-sectional surveys administered face-to-face and within 2 weeks, </description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Mar</publication><modification>2026-05-09T15:35:27.246Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T19:05:43.025Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8915337</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35273055</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056076</doi></cross_references></HashMap>