<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Filip P</submitter><funding>NIBIB NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><funding>NINDS NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><pagination>765-773</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8916973</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>64(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Neuroimaging pipelines have long been known to generate mildly differing results depending on various factors, including software version. While considered generally acceptable and within the margin of reasonable error, little is known about their effect in common research scenarios such as inter-group comparisons between healthy controls and various pathological conditions. The aim of the presented study was to explore the differences in the inferences and statistical significances in a model situation comparing volumetric parameters between healthy controls and type 1 diabetes patients using various FreeSurfer versions.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>T1- and T2-weighted structural scans of healthy controls and type 1 diabetes patients were processed with FreeSurfer 5.3, FreeSurfer 5.3 HC</pubmed_abstract><journal>Neuroradiology</journal><pubmed_title>Different FreeSurfer versions might generate different statistical outcomes in case-control comparison studies.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8916973</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R56DK099137</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>KL2TR000113</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 NS076408</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P41 EB027061</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01DK099137</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1TR000114</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DK099137</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR000114</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P41 EB015894</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>KL2 TR000113</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R56 DK099137</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Mangia S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Filip P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Seaquist ER</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moheet A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grohn H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kumar AF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eberly LE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bednarik P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Svatkova A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Different FreeSurfer versions might generate different statistical outcomes in case-control comparison studies.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Neuroimaging pipelines have long been known to generate mildly differing results depending on various factors, including software version. While considered generally acceptable and within the margin of reasonable error, little is known about their effect in common research scenarios such as inter-group comparisons between healthy controls and various pathological conditions. The aim of the presented study was to explore the differences in the inferences and statistical significances in a model situation comparing volumetric parameters between healthy controls and type 1 diabetes patients using various FreeSurfer versions.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>T1- and T2-weighted structural scans of healthy controls and type 1 diabetes patients were processed with FreeSurfer 5.3, FreeSurfer 5.3 HC</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-22T11:48:16.97Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T00:07:55.879Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8916973</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34988592</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00234-021-02862-0</doi></cross_references></HashMap>