<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Kumar RG</submitter><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>67-75</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8917887</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>39(1-2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Several studies have characterized comorbidities among individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, there are few validated TBI comorbidity indices. Widely used indices (e.g., Elixhauser Comorbidity Index [ECI]) were developed in other patient populations and anchor to mortality or healthcare utilization, not functioning, and notably exclude conditions known to co-occur with TBI. The objectives of this study were to develop and validate a functionally relevant TBI comorbidity index (Fx-TBI-CI) and to compare prognostication of the Fx-TBI-CI with the &lt;i>ECI&lt;/i>. We used data from the eRehabData database to divide the sample randomly into a training sample (N = 21,292) and an internal validation sample (N = 9166). We used data from the TBI Model Systems National Database as an external validation sample (N = 1925). We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to narrow the list of functionally relevant conditions from 39 to 12. In internal validation, the Fx-TBI-CI explained 14.1% incremental variance over an age and sex model predicting the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor subscale at inpatient rehabilitation discharge, compared with 2.4% explained by the ECI. In external validation, the Fx-TBI-CI explained 4.9% incremental variance over age and sex and 3.8% over age, sex, and Glasgow Coma Scale score,compared with 2.1% and 1.6% incremental variance, respectively, explained by the ECI. An unweighted Sum Condition Score including the same conditions as the Fx-TBI-CI conferred similar prognostication. Although the Fx-TBI-CI had only modest incremental variance over demographics and injury severity in predicting functioning in external validation, the Fx-TBI-CI outperformed the ECI in predicting post-TBI function.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of neurotrauma</journal><pubmed_title>Development and Validation of a Functionally Relevant Comorbid Health Index in Adults Admitted to Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8917887</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U24 CA224319</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG054540</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA196521</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG028741</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Lercher K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dams-O'Connor K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Whiteneck GG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mazumdar M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hammond FM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Egorova N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhong X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kumar RG</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Development and Validation of a Functionally Relevant Comorbid Health Index in Adults Admitted to Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury.</name><description>Several studies have characterized comorbidities among individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, there are few validated TBI comorbidity indices. Widely used indices (e.g., Elixhauser Comorbidity Index [ECI]) were developed in other patient populations and anchor to mortality or healthcare utilization, not functioning, and notably exclude conditions known to co-occur with TBI. The objectives of this study were to develop and validate a functionally relevant TBI comorbidity index (Fx-TBI-CI) and to compare prognostication of the Fx-TBI-CI with the &lt;i>ECI&lt;/i>. We used data from the eRehabData database to divide the sample randomly into a training sample (N = 21,292) and an internal validation sample (N = 9166). We used data from the TBI Model Systems National Database as an external validation sample (N = 1925). We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to narrow the list of functionally relevant conditions from 39 to 12. In internal validation, the Fx-TBI-CI explained 14.1% incremental variance over an age and sex model predicting the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor subscale at inpatient rehabilitation discharge, compared with 2.4% explained by the ECI. In external validation, the Fx-TBI-CI explained 4.9% incremental variance over age and sex and 3.8% over age, sex, and Glasgow Coma Scale score,compared with 2.1% and 1.6% incremental variance, respectively, explained by the ECI. An unweighted Sum Condition Score including the same conditions as the Fx-TBI-CI conferred similar prognostication. Although the Fx-TBI-CI had only modest incremental variance over demographics and injury severity in predicting functioning in external validation, the Fx-TBI-CI outperformed the ECI in predicting post-TBI function.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-26T00:27:15.023Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T09:41:34.538Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8917887</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34779252</pubmed><doi>10.1089/neu.2021.0180</doi></cross_references></HashMap>