<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Gao F</submitter><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><pagination>1446-1461</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8918003</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>41(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Longitudinal cohorts to determine the incidence of HIV infection are logistically challenging, so researchers have sought alternative strategies. Recency test methods use biomarker profiles of HIV-infected subjects in a cross-sectional sample to infer whether they are "recently" infected and to estimate incidence in the population. Two main estimators have been used in practice: one that assumes a recency test is perfectly specific, and another that allows for false-recent results. To date, these commonly used estimators have not been rigorously studied with respect to their assumptions and statistical properties. In this article, we present a theoretical framework with which to understand these estimators and interrogate their assumptions, and perform a simulation study and data analysis </pubmed_abstract><journal>Statistics in medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Statistical considerations for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation based on recency test.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8918003</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R56 AI143418</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>S10OD028685</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>S10 OD028685</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Bannick M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gao F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Statistical considerations for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation based on recency test.</name><description>Longitudinal cohorts to determine the incidence of HIV infection are logistically challenging, so researchers have sought alternative strategies. Recency test methods use biomarker profiles of HIV-infected subjects in a cross-sectional sample to infer whether they are "recently" infected and to estimate incidence in the population. Two main estimators have been used in practice: one that assumes a recency test is perfectly specific, and another that allows for false-recent results. To date, these commonly used estimators have not been rigorously studied with respect to their assumptions and statistical properties. In this article, we present a theoretical framework with which to understand these estimators and interrogate their assumptions, and perform a simulation study and data analysis </description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-21T22:52:23.876Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T19:00:02.835Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8918003</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34984710</pubmed><doi>10.1002/sim.9296</doi></cross_references></HashMap>