<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Yakushev I</submitter><funding>Technische Universität München</funding><funding>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</funding><pagination>1288-1297</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8921091</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>49(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Inter-subject covariance of regional 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET measures (FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub>) as proxy of brain connectivity has been gaining an increasing acceptance in the community. Yet, it is still unclear to what extent FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub> is underlied by actual structural connectivity via white matter fiber tracts. In this study, we quantified the degree of spatial overlap between FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub> and structural connectivity networks.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We retrospectively analyzed neuroimaging data from 303 subjects, both patients with suspected neurodegenerative disorders and healthy individuals. For each subject, structural magnetic resonance, diffusion tensor imaging, and FDG-PET data were available. The images were spatially normalized to a standard space and segmented into 62 anatomical regions using a probabilistic atlas. Sparse inverse covariance estimation was employed to estimate FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub>. Structural connectivity was measured by streamline tractography through fiber assignment by continuous tracking.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>For the whole brain, 55% of detected connections were found to be convergent, i.e., present in both FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub> and structural networks. This metric for random networks was significantly lower, i.e., 12%. Convergent were 80% of intralobe connections and only 30% of interhemispheric interlobe connections.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Structural connectivity via white matter fiber tracts is a relevant substrate of FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub>, underlying around a half of connections at the whole brain level. Short-range white matter tracts appear to be a major substrate of intralobe FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub> connections.</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</journal><pubmed_title>Mapping covariance in brain FDG uptake to structural connectivity.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8921091</pmcid><funding_grant_id>YA 373/3-1</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Wang M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lizarraga A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grimmer T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yakushev I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Savio A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ripp I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schutte M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hedderich DM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bogdanovic B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shi K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diehl-Schmid J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Mapping covariance in brain FDG uptake to structural connectivity.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Inter-subject covariance of regional 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET measures (FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub>) as proxy of brain connectivity has been gaining an increasing acceptance in the community. Yet, it is still unclear to what extent FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub> is underlied by actual structural connectivity via white matter fiber tracts. In this study, we quantified the degree of spatial overlap between FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub> and structural connectivity networks.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We retrospectively analyzed neuroimaging data from 303 subjects, both patients with suspected neurodegenerative disorders and healthy individuals. For each subject, structural magnetic resonance, diffusion tensor imaging, and FDG-PET data were available. The images were spatially normalized to a standard space and segmented into 62 anatomical regions using a probabilistic atlas. Sparse inverse covariance estimation was employed to estimate FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub>. Structural connectivity was measured by streamline tractography through fiber assignment by continuous tracking.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>For the whole brain, 55% of detected connections were found to be convergent, i.e., present in both FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub> and structural networks. This metric for random networks was significantly lower, i.e., 12%. Convergent were 80% of intralobe connections and only 30% of interhemispheric interlobe connections.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Structural connectivity via white matter fiber tracts is a relevant substrate of FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub>, underlying around a half of connections at the whole brain level. Short-range white matter tracts appear to be a major substrate of intralobe FDG&lt;sub>cov&lt;/sub> connections.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-04T13:21:50.653Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T13:21:50.653Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8921091</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34677627</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00259-021-05590-y</doi></cross_references></HashMap>