<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>61(3)</volume><submitter>Slater T</submitter><funding>Nottingham Trent University</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>This study aimed to assess the effects of consuming a very-low-energy placebo breakfast on subsequent appetite and lunch energy intake.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Fourteen healthy males consumed water-only (WAT), very-low-energy, viscous placebo (containing water, low-calorie flavoured squash, and xanthan gum; ~ 16 kcal; PLA), and whole-food (~ 573 kcal; FOOD) breakfasts in a randomised order. Subjects were blinded to the energy content of PLA and specific study aims. Venous blood samples were collected pre-breakfast, 60- and 180-min post-breakfast to assess plasma acylated ghrelin and peptide tyrosine tyrosine concentrations. Subjective appetite was measured regularly, and energy intake was assessed at an ad libitum lunch meal 195-min post-breakfast.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Lunch energy intake was lower during FOOD compared to WAT (P &lt; 0.05), with no further differences between trials (P ≥ 0.132). Cumulative energy intake (breakfast plus lunch) was lower during PLA (1078 ± 274 kcal) and WAT (1093 ± 249 kcal), compared to FOOD (1554 ± 301 kcal; P &lt; 0.001). Total area under the curve (AUC) for hunger, desire to eat and prospective food consumption were lower, and fullness was greater during PLA and FOOD compared to WAT (P &lt; 0.05). AUC for hunger was lower during FOOD compared to PLA (P &lt; 0.05). During FOOD, acylated ghrelin was suppressed compared to PLA and WAT at 60 min (P &lt; 0.05), with no other hormonal differences between trials (P ≥ 0.071).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Consuming a very-low-energy placebo breakfast does not alter energy intake at lunch but may reduce cumulative energy intake across breakfast and lunch and attenuate elevations in subjective appetite associated with breakfast omission.&lt;h4>Trial registration&lt;/h4>NCT04735783, 2nd February 2021, retrospectively registered.</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of nutrition</journal><pagination>1319-1330</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8921169</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Effect of the perception of breakfast consumption on subsequent appetite and energy intake in healthy males.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8921169</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Mode WJA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>James RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sale C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hough J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Slater T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clayton DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>James LJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effect of the perception of breakfast consumption on subsequent appetite and energy intake in healthy males.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>This study aimed to assess the effects of consuming a very-low-energy placebo breakfast on subsequent appetite and lunch energy intake.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Fourteen healthy males consumed water-only (WAT), very-low-energy, viscous placebo (containing water, low-calorie flavoured squash, and xanthan gum; ~ 16 kcal; PLA), and whole-food (~ 573 kcal; FOOD) breakfasts in a randomised order. Subjects were blinded to the energy content of PLA and specific study aims. Venous blood samples were collected pre-breakfast, 60- and 180-min post-breakfast to assess plasma acylated ghrelin and peptide tyrosine tyrosine concentrations. Subjective appetite was measured regularly, and energy intake was assessed at an ad libitum lunch meal 195-min post-breakfast.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Lunch energy intake was lower during FOOD compared to WAT (P &lt; 0.05), with no further differences between trials (P ≥ 0.132). Cumulative energy intake (breakfast plus lunch) was lower during PLA (1078 ± 274 kcal) and WAT (1093 ± 249 kcal), compared to FOOD (1554 ± 301 kcal; P &lt; 0.001). Total area under the curve (AUC) for hunger, desire to eat and prospective food consumption were lower, and fullness was greater during PLA and FOOD compared to WAT (P &lt; 0.05). AUC for hunger was lower during FOOD compared to PLA (P &lt; 0.05). During FOOD, acylated ghrelin was suppressed compared to PLA and WAT at 60 min (P &lt; 0.05), with no other hormonal differences between trials (P ≥ 0.071).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Consuming a very-low-energy placebo breakfast does not alter energy intake at lunch but may reduce cumulative energy intake across breakfast and lunch and attenuate elevations in subjective appetite associated with breakfast omission.&lt;h4>Trial registration&lt;/h4>NCT04735783, 2nd February 2021, retrospectively registered.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Apr</publication><modification>2026-06-19T03:19:06.079Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T02:01:56.191Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8921169</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34766208</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00394-021-02727-5</doi></cross_references></HashMap>