<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Cupp JA</submitter><funding>Health Sciences Center at Prisma Health</funding><pagination>2768-2776</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8926086</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>37(11)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>For patients with substance use disorder (SUD), a peer recovery coach (PRC) intervention increases engagement in recovery services; effective support services interventions have occasionally demonstrated cost savings through decreased acute care utilization.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Examine effect of PRCs on acute care utilization.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Combined results of 2 parallel 1:1 randomized controlled trials.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Inpatient adults with substance use disorder INTERVENTIONS: Inpatient PRC linkage and follow-up contact for 6 months vs usual care (providing contact information for SUD resources and PRCs) MAIN MEASURES: Acute care encounters (emergency and inpatient) 6 months before and after enrollment; encounter type by primary diagnosis code category (mental/behavio</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of general internal medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Acute Care Utilization After Recovery Coaching Linkage During Substance-Related Inpatient Admission: Results of Two Randomized Controlled Trials.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8926086</pmcid><funding_grant_id>Transformative Research Seed Grant</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Byrne KA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roth PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cupp JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Herbert K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Acute Care Utilization After Recovery Coaching Linkage During Substance-Related Inpatient Admission: Results of Two Randomized Controlled Trials.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>For patients with substance use disorder (SUD), a peer recovery coach (PRC) intervention increases engagement in recovery services; effective support services interventions have occasionally demonstrated cost savings through decreased acute care utilization.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Examine effect of PRCs on acute care utilization.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Combined results of 2 parallel 1:1 randomized controlled trials.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Inpatient adults with substance use disorder INTERVENTIONS: Inpatient PRC linkage and follow-up contact for 6 months vs usual care (providing contact information for SUD resources and PRCs) MAIN MEASURES: Acute care encounters (emergency and inpatient) 6 months before and after enrollment; encounter type by primary diagnosis code category (mental/behavio</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Aug</publication><modification>2026-05-31T08:59:35.251Z</modification><creation>2022-07-08T04:33:03.783Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8926086</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35296984</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s11606-021-07360-w</doi></cross_references></HashMap>