{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Giugale L"],"funding":["NICHD NIH HHS"],"pagination":["142-148"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8928054"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["28(3)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Importance</h4>Many health care providers place concomitant midurethral slings during pelvic organ prolapse repair, yet growing evidence supports staged midurethral sling placement.<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this study was to compare urinary function after transvaginal uterovaginal prolapse repair with and without midurethral sling.<h4>Study design</h4>Secondary analysis of the Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial (hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension vs mesh hysteropexy). Our primary outcome was Urinary Distress Inventory score (UDI-6) through 5 years compared between women with and without a concomitant sling within prolapse repair arms. Sling effect was adjusted for select clinical variables and interaction terms (α = .05).<h4>Results</h4>The sling g"],"journal":["Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery"],"pubmed_title":["Long-term Urinary Outcomes After Transvaginal Uterovaginal Prolapse Repair With and Without Concomitant Midurethral Slings."],"pmcid":["PMC8928054"],"funding_grant_id":["UG1 HD069013","UG1 HD069025","UG1 HD041261","U10 HD041267","U10 HD041261","U10 HD069025","U10 HD069006","UG1 HD069010","U10 HD069010","U10 HD069013","UG1 HD054215","UG1 HD054214","U10 HD054215","U01 HD069031","U10 HD054214","U24 HD069031","UG1 HD041267","UG1 HD069006"],"pubmed_authors":["Ferrante KL","Smith AL","Myers D","Gantz M","Zyczynski HM","Meyer I","Giugale L","Visco AG","Mazloomdoost D","Komesu YM","Sridhar A","Paraiso MFR","NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Long-term Urinary Outcomes After Transvaginal Uterovaginal Prolapse Repair With and Without Concomitant Midurethral Slings.","description":"<h4>Importance</h4>Many health care providers place concomitant midurethral slings during pelvic organ prolapse repair, yet growing evidence supports staged midurethral sling placement.<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this study was to compare urinary function after transvaginal uterovaginal prolapse repair with and without midurethral sling.<h4>Study design</h4>Secondary analysis of the Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial (hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension vs mesh hysteropexy). Our primary outcome was Urinary Distress Inventory score (UDI-6) through 5 years compared between women with and without a concomitant sling within prolapse repair arms. Sling effect was adjusted for select clinical variables and interaction terms (α = .05).<h4>Results</h4>The sling g","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Mar","modification":"2025-04-19T07:34:47.805Z","creation":"2025-04-19T07:34:47.805Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC8928054","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35272320"],"doi":["10.1097/spv.0000000000001160","10.1097/SPV.0000000000001160"]}}