<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Wadhwani SI</submitter><funding>National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences</funding><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases</funding><funding>American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases</funding><pagination>115-124</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8934136</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>75(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background and aims&lt;/h4>Racial/ethnic minority children have worse liver transplant (LT) outcomes. We evaluated whether neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation affected associations between race/ethnicity and wait-list mortality.&lt;h4>Approach and results&lt;/h4>We included children (age &lt;18) listed 2005-2015 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We categorized patients as non-Hispanic White, Black, Hispanic, and other. We matched patient ZIP codes to a neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation index (range, 0-1; higher values indicate worse deprivation). Primary outcomes were wait-list mortality, defined as death/delisting for too sick, and receipt of living donor liver transplant (LDLT). Competing risk analyses modeled the association between race/ethnicity and wait-list mortality, with deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) and LDLT as competing risks, and race/ethnicity and LDLT, with wait-list mortality and DDLT as competing risks. Of 7716 children, 17% and 24% identified as Black and Hispanic, respectively. Compared to White children, Black and Hispanic children had increased unadjusted hazard of wait-list mortality (subhazard ratio [sHR], 1.44; 95% CI, 1.18, 1.75 and sHR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.25, 1.76, respectively). After adjusting for neighborhood deprivation, insurance, and listing laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease, Black and Hispanic children did not have increased hazard of wait-list mortality (sHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91, 1.39 and sHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00, 1.47, respectively). Similarly, Black and Hispanic children had a decreased likelihood of LDLT (sHR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45, 0.75 and sHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.49, 0.75, respectively). Adjustment attenuated the effect of Black and Hispanic race/ethnicity on likelihood of LDLT (sHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60, 1.02 and sHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.70, 1.11, respectively).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Household and neighborhood socioeconomic factors and disease severity at wait-list entry help explain racial/ethnic disparities for children awaiting transplant. A nuanced understanding of how social adversity contributes to wait-list outcomes may inform strategies to improve outcomes.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</journal><pubmed_title>Racial/ethnic disparities in wait-list outcomes are only partly explained by socioeconomic deprivation among children awaiting liver transplantation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8934136</pmcid><funding_grant_id>T32 DK007727</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 DK026743</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 DK 7727‐24</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>KL2 TR001870</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 DK060414</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DK 060414‐17</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>KL2TR001870</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Neuhaus J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beck AF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lai JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bucuvalas J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lyles C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gottlieb L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kotagal U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ge J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wadhwani SI</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Racial/ethnic disparities in wait-list outcomes are only partly explained by socioeconomic deprivation among children awaiting liver transplantation.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background and aims&lt;/h4>Racial/ethnic minority children have worse liver transplant (LT) outcomes. We evaluated whether neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation affected associations between race/ethnicity and wait-list mortality.&lt;h4>Approach and results&lt;/h4>We included children (age &lt;18) listed 2005-2015 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We categorized patients as non-Hispanic White, Black, Hispanic, and other. We matched patient ZIP codes to a neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation index (range, 0-1; higher values indicate worse deprivation). Primary outcomes were wait-list mortality, defined as death/delisting for too sick, and receipt of living donor liver transplant (LDLT). Competing risk analyses modeled the association between race/ethnicity and wait-list mortality, with deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) and LDLT as competing risks, and race/ethnicity and LDLT, with wait-list mortality and DDLT as competing risks. Of 7716 children, 17% and 24% identified as Black and Hispanic, respectively. Compared to White children, Black and Hispanic children had increased unadjusted hazard of wait-list mortality (subhazard ratio [sHR], 1.44; 95% CI, 1.18, 1.75 and sHR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.25, 1.76, respectively). After adjusting for neighborhood deprivation, insurance, and listing laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease, Black and Hispanic children did not have increased hazard of wait-list mortality (sHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91, 1.39 and sHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00, 1.47, respectively). Similarly, Black and Hispanic children had a decreased likelihood of LDLT (sHR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45, 0.75 and sHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.49, 0.75, respectively). Adjustment attenuated the effect of Black and Hispanic race/ethnicity on likelihood of LDLT (sHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60, 1.02 and sHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.70, 1.11, respectively).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Household and neighborhood socioeconomic factors and disease severity at wait-list entry help explain racial/ethnic disparities for children awaiting transplant. A nuanced understanding of how social adversity contributes to wait-list outcomes may inform strategies to improve outcomes.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-21T15:23:16.722Z</modification><creation>2025-04-21T15:23:16.722Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8934136</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34387881</pubmed><doi>10.1002/hep.32106</doi></cross_references></HashMap>