<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Aoyagi K</submitter><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NINDS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIAMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>545-550</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8940656</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>30(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is predominantly characterized by pain with weight-bearing activities. Pain at rest also occurs but the mechanisms for this are not clear. We evaluated the relations of nociceptive signal alterations to weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing pain in knee OA.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>We used data from a NIH-funded longitudinal cohort of older adults with or at risk of knee OA. We evaluated quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures (pressure pain threshold (PPT) at patellae and the wrist; mechanical temporal summation (TS); conditioned pain modulation (CPM)). Each WOMAC pain question was dichotomized as having at least moderate pain, and we further categorized them as weight-bearing pain and non-weight-bearing pain. We evaluated the relation of QST measures to each pain outcome using logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>2,749 participants (5,479 knees) were included (mean age 64 ± 11, 57% female). Each SD unit decrease in patellar PPT was associated with greater odds of both weight-bearing pain (OR 1.51 (95% CI 1.27, 1.79)) and non-weight-bearing pain (OR 1.46 (1.20-1.77)), while wrist PPT was associated with greater odds of weight-bearing pain (OR 1.27 (1.15, 1.39)) but only with pain during sitting/lying (OR 1.20 (1.01, 1.43)). TS was significantly associated with greater odds of pain with walking and stairs (OR 1.11 (1.01, 1.23), 1.11 (1.03, 1.20), respectively). CPM was not associated with any pain outcomes.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Our findings challenge the hypothesis that non-weight-bearing pain may reflect greater pain sensitization and/or inefficient CPM than weight-bearing pain in knee OA, suggesting other mechanisms are likely responsible.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Osteoarthritis and cartilage</journal><pubmed_title>Does weight-bearing versus non-weight-bearing pain reflect different pain mechanisms in knee osteoarthritis?: the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST).</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8940656</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 AR072571</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 AG018947</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG066010</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 NS048597</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 NS121419</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01 AR069720</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 AG018832</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P60 AR047785</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 AG018820</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG066914</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K24 AR070892</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 AG019069</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kumar D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frey Law L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lewis CE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aoyagi K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liew JW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Neogi T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Farrar JT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nevitt M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carlesso L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Does weight-bearing versus non-weight-bearing pain reflect different pain mechanisms in knee osteoarthritis?: the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST).</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is predominantly characterized by pain with weight-bearing activities. Pain at rest also occurs but the mechanisms for this are not clear. We evaluated the relations of nociceptive signal alterations to weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing pain in knee OA.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>We used data from a NIH-funded longitudinal cohort of older adults with or at risk of knee OA. We evaluated quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures (pressure pain threshold (PPT) at patellae and the wrist; mechanical temporal summation (TS); conditioned pain modulation (CPM)). Each WOMAC pain question was dichotomized as having at least moderate pain, and we further categorized them as weight-bearing pain and non-weight-bearing pain. We evaluated the relation of QST measures to each pain outcome using logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>2,749 participants (5,479 knees) were included (mean age 64 ± 11, 57% female). Each SD unit decrease in patellar PPT was associated with greater odds of both weight-bearing pain (OR 1.51 (95% CI 1.27, 1.79)) and non-weight-bearing pain (OR 1.46 (1.20-1.77)), while wrist PPT was associated with greater odds of weight-bearing pain (OR 1.27 (1.15, 1.39)) but only with pain during sitting/lying (OR 1.20 (1.01, 1.43)). TS was significantly associated with greater odds of pain with walking and stairs (OR 1.11 (1.01, 1.23), 1.11 (1.03, 1.20), respectively). CPM was not associated with any pain outcomes.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Our findings challenge the hypothesis that non-weight-bearing pain may reflect greater pain sensitization and/or inefficient CPM than weight-bearing pain in knee OA, suggesting other mechanisms are likely responsible.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-21T22:34:40.605Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T18:52:30.408Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8940656</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34801670</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.joca.2021.10.014</doi></cross_references></HashMap>