<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(6)</volume><submitter>Maffioli M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Ruxolitinib (RUX) is extensively used in myelofibrosis (MF). Despite its early efficacy, most patients lose response over time and, after discontinuation, have a worse overall survival (OS). Currently, response criteria able to predict OS in RUX-treated patients are lacking, leading to uncertainty regarding the switch to second-line treatments. In this study, we investigated predictors of survival collected after 6 months of RUX in 209 MF patients participating in the real-world ambispective observational RUXOREL-MF study (NCT03959371). Multivariable analysis identified the following risk factors: (1) RUX dose &lt;20 mg twice daily at baseline, months 3 and 6 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-3.00; P = .03), (2) palpable spleen length reduction from baseline ≤30% at</pubmed_abstract><journal>Blood advances</journal><pagination>1855-1864</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8941454</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A prognostic model to predict survival after 6 months of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8941454</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Guidetti A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Iurlo A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caberlon S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caramella M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ubezio M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Komrokji R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carraro MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mora B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Polverelli N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Della Porta MG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lunghi F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giorgino T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bertu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>D'Adda M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maffioli M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sissa C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rumi E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vismara A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anghilieri M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuykendall A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Finazzi MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Passamonti F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Molteni A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ball S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cattaneo D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brociner M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elli EM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A prognostic model to predict survival after 6 months of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis.</name><description>Ruxolitinib (RUX) is extensively used in myelofibrosis (MF). Despite its early efficacy, most patients lose response over time and, after discontinuation, have a worse overall survival (OS). Currently, response criteria able to predict OS in RUX-treated patients are lacking, leading to uncertainty regarding the switch to second-line treatments. In this study, we investigated predictors of survival collected after 6 months of RUX in 209 MF patients participating in the real-world ambispective observational RUXOREL-MF study (NCT03959371). Multivariable analysis identified the following risk factors: (1) RUX dose &lt;20 mg twice daily at baseline, months 3 and 6 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-3.00; P = .03), (2) palpable spleen length reduction from baseline ≤30% at</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Mar</publication><modification>2026-05-09T19:51:35.433Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T09:57:56.164Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8941454</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35130339</pubmed><doi>10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006889</doi></cross_references></HashMap>