<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Kambeitz-Ilankovic L</submitter><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><funding>the EU-FP7 project PRONIA</funding><pagination>828-845</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8942567</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>107</volume><pubmed_abstract>Cognitive remediation (CR) is nowadays mainly administered in a computerized fashion, yet frequently supplemented by human guidance. The effects of CR on cognitive, functional and clinical outcomes are consistently reported, yet the response is heterogeneous. In order to resolve this heterogeneity, we employed a multi-outcome meta-analytic approach, examined effects of CR on each outcome category separately and estimated directed effects between three outcome categories. We extracted treatment effects from 67 studies that trained patients with schizophrenia (total n = 4067) using either 1) computerized CR modality alone or 2) in combination with supplementary human guidance (SHG). All three outcome domains were significantly improved by CR with small to moderate effect sizes when assessing</pubmed_abstract><journal>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</journal><pubmed_title>Multi-outcome meta-analysis (MOMA) of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: Revisiting the relevance of human coaching and elucidating interplay between multiple outcomes.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8942567</pmcid><funding_grant_id>602152</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 MH122897</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01 MH105615</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Betz LT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dominke C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kambeitz J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Subramaniam K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fisher M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haas SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kambeitz-Ilankovic L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koutsouleris N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vinogradov S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Multi-outcome meta-analysis (MOMA) of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: Revisiting the relevance of human coaching and elucidating interplay between multiple outcomes.</name><description>Cognitive remediation (CR) is nowadays mainly administered in a computerized fashion, yet frequently supplemented by human guidance. The effects of CR on cognitive, functional and clinical outcomes are consistently reported, yet the response is heterogeneous. In order to resolve this heterogeneity, we employed a multi-outcome meta-analytic approach, examined effects of CR on each outcome category separately and estimated directed effects between three outcome categories. We extracted treatment effects from 67 studies that trained patients with schizophrenia (total n = 4067) using either 1) computerized CR modality alone or 2) in combination with supplementary human guidance (SHG). All three outcome domains were significantly improved by CR with small to moderate effect sizes when assessing</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Dec</publication><modification>2026-05-30T15:14:56.497Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T22:38:12.004Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8942567</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31557548</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.031</doi></cross_references></HashMap>