{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["13"],"submitter":["Fugmann D"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Introduction</h4>Research on the impact of cancer on close relationships brings up conflicting results. This systematic review collects empirical evidence on the research questions whether a cancer diagnosis in general or the type of cancer affects the divorce rate.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>This systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and the PRISMA statement. The following electronic databases were searched: Web of Science, Ovid SP MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PsyINDEX, CINAHL, ERIC. Risk of bias assessment was performed with the preliminary risk of bias for exposures tool template (ROBINS-E tool). The grading of methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.<h4>Results</h4>Of 13,929 identified records, 15 were included"],"journal":["Frontiers in psychology"],"pagination":["828656"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8959852"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["A Systematic Review: The Effect of Cancer on the Divorce Rate."],"pmcid":["PMC8959852"],"pubmed_authors":["Prins J","Karger A","Boeker M","Holsteg S","Fugmann D","Steiner N"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"A Systematic Review: The Effect of Cancer on the Divorce Rate.","description":"<h4>Introduction</h4>Research on the impact of cancer on close relationships brings up conflicting results. This systematic review collects empirical evidence on the research questions whether a cancer diagnosis in general or the type of cancer affects the divorce rate.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>This systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and the PRISMA statement. The following electronic databases were searched: Web of Science, Ovid SP MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PsyINDEX, CINAHL, ERIC. Risk of bias assessment was performed with the preliminary risk of bias for exposures tool template (ROBINS-E tool). The grading of methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.<h4>Results</h4>Of 13,929 identified records, 15 were included","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022","modification":"2025-04-27T01:10:47.38Z","creation":"2025-04-06T18:07:54.081Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC8959852","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35356338"],"doi":["10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828656"]}}