<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13</volume><submitter>Fugmann D</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Research on the impact of cancer on close relationships brings up conflicting results. This systematic review collects empirical evidence on the research questions whether a cancer diagnosis in general or the type of cancer affects the divorce rate.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>This systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and the PRISMA statement. The following electronic databases were searched: Web of Science, Ovid SP MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PsyINDEX, CINAHL, ERIC. Risk of bias assessment was performed with the preliminary risk of bias for exposures tool template (ROBINS-E tool). The grading of methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Of 13,929 identified records, 15 were included</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in psychology</journal><pagination>828656</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8959852</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A Systematic Review: The Effect of Cancer on the Divorce Rate.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8959852</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Prins J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karger A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boeker M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Holsteg S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fugmann D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Steiner N</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A Systematic Review: The Effect of Cancer on the Divorce Rate.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Research on the impact of cancer on close relationships brings up conflicting results. This systematic review collects empirical evidence on the research questions whether a cancer diagnosis in general or the type of cancer affects the divorce rate.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>This systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and the PRISMA statement. The following electronic databases were searched: Web of Science, Ovid SP MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PsyINDEX, CINAHL, ERIC. Risk of bias assessment was performed with the preliminary risk of bias for exposures tool template (ROBINS-E tool). The grading of methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Of 13,929 identified records, 15 were included</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-27T01:10:47.38Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T18:07:54.081Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8959852</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35356338</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828656</doi></cross_references></HashMap>