<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9</volume><submitter>Zhang Y</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical adverse events in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) vs. tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) anatomy and the efficacy of balloon-expandable (BE) vs. self-expanding (SE) valves in the BAV population. Comparisons aforementioned will be made stratified into early- and new-generation devices. Differences of prosthetic geometry on CT between patients with BAV and TAV were presented. In addition, BAV morphological presentations in included studies were summarized.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Observational studies and a randomized controlled trial of patients with BAV undergoing TAVR were included according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and </pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine</journal><pagination>794850</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8965870</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8965870</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Peng Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu ZK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wei X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tang H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meng W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huang FY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ou Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yao YJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao ZG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bao Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang HR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Feng Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li YM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li YJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liao YB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xiong TY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zheng MX</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wei JF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou WX</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical adverse events in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) vs. tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) anatomy and the efficacy of balloon-expandable (BE) vs. self-expanding (SE) valves in the BAV population. Comparisons aforementioned will be made stratified into early- and new-generation devices. Differences of prosthetic geometry on CT between patients with BAV and TAV were presented. In addition, BAV morphological presentations in included studies were summarized.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Observational studies and a randomized controlled trial of patients with BAV undergoing TAVR were included according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and </description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2026-05-31T06:03:19.462Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T01:55:24.746Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8965870</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35369357</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fcvm.2022.794850</doi></cross_references></HashMap>