<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hatten SJ</submitter><funding>American Cancer Society</funding><funding>Genentech</funding><funding>Penn State College of Medicine</funding><funding>Cancer Council Tasmania</funding><funding>Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>Janssen Pharmaceuticals</funding><pagination>100909</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8971834</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>7(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>The abscopal effect is defined when a form of local therapy causes tumor regression of both the target lesion and any untreated tumors. Herein cases of the abscopal effect were systematically reviewed and a patient-level data analysis was performed for clinical predictors of both duration of response and survival.&lt;h4>Methods and materials&lt;/h4>The Population, Intervention, Control, Outcome, Study (PICOS) design approach, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) literature selection process, and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) were used to find articles published before September 2019 in MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria were (1) population: patients with reported abscopal response; (2) intervention: documented treatment(s); (3) control: none; (4) outcomes: overall and progression-free survival; and (5) setting: retrospective case reports. Time from treatment until abscopal response and time from abscopal response until progression/death were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for survival outcomes.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Fifty studies (n = 55 patients) were included. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-70) and 62% were male. Fifty-four (98%) patients received radiation therapy, 34 (62%) received radiation therapy alone, 5 (9.1%) underwent surgery, 4 (7.3%) received chemotherapy, and 11 (20%) received immunotherapy. Median total dose was 32 Gy (IQR, 25.5-48 Gy) and median dose per fraction was 3 Gy (IQR, 2-7.2). Median time until abscopal response was 4 months (IQR, 1-5; min 0.5, max 24). At 5 years, overall survival was 63% and distant progression-free survival was 45%. No variables had statistical significance in predicting duration of response or survival.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Almost all reported cases of the abscopal response are after radiation therapy; however, there are no known predictors of duration of response or survival in this population.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Advances in radiation oncology</journal><pubmed_title>A Patient-Level Data Meta-analysis of the Abscopal Effect.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8971834</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 CA008748</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>LRP 1 L30 CA231572-01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CSDG-20-013-01-CCE</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>L30 CA231572</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Liao J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Trifiletti DM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zaorsky NG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Siva S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sha CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Holder SL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McBride SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hatten SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lehrer EJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palma D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A Patient-Level Data Meta-analysis of the Abscopal Effect.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>The abscopal effect is defined when a form of local therapy causes tumor regression of both the target lesion and any untreated tumors. Herein cases of the abscopal effect were systematically reviewed and a patient-level data analysis was performed for clinical predictors of both duration of response and survival.&lt;h4>Methods and materials&lt;/h4>The Population, Intervention, Control, Outcome, Study (PICOS) design approach, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) literature selection process, and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) were used to find articles published before September 2019 in MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria were (1) population: patients with reported abscopal response; (2) intervention: documented treatment(s); (3) control: none; (4) outcomes: overall and progression-free survival; and (5) setting: retrospective case reports. Time from treatment until abscopal response and time from abscopal response until progression/death were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for survival outcomes.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Fifty studies (n = 55 patients) were included. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-70) and 62% were male. Fifty-four (98%) patients received radiation therapy, 34 (62%) received radiation therapy alone, 5 (9.1%) underwent surgery, 4 (7.3%) received chemotherapy, and 11 (20%) received immunotherapy. Median total dose was 32 Gy (IQR, 25.5-48 Gy) and median dose per fraction was 3 Gy (IQR, 2-7.2). Median time until abscopal response was 4 months (IQR, 1-5; min 0.5, max 24). At 5 years, overall survival was 63% and distant progression-free survival was 45%. No variables had statistical significance in predicting duration of response or survival.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Almost all reported cases of the abscopal response are after radiation therapy; however, there are no known predictors of duration of response or survival in this population.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 May-Jun</publication><modification>2025-08-23T03:04:54.411Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T14:50:00.742Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8971834</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35372719</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.adro.2022.100909</doi></cross_references></HashMap>