<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Maroni R</submitter><funding>National Health Service</funding><funding>Cancer Research UK</funding><funding>Medtronic</funding><funding>Yorkshire Cancer Research</funding><funding>NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre</funding><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><pagination>e054258</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8990713</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The BEST3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the Cytosponge-trefoil factor 3, a cell collection device coupled with the biomarker trefoil factor 3, as a tool for detecting Barrett's oesophagus, a precursor of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), in primary care. In this nested study, our aim was to understand patient experiences.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Mixed-methods using questionnaires (including Inventory to Assess Patient Satisfaction, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 and two-item perceived risk) and interviews.&lt;h4>Outcome measures&lt;/h4>Participant satisfaction, anxiety and perceived risk of developing OAC.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>General practices in England.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Patients with acid reflux enrolled in the intervention arm of the BEST3 trial and attendi</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pubmed_title>Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8990713</pmcid><funding_grant_id>C8162/A25356</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>L389SS</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>no award/grant number</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RG84369</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>C14478/A21047</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>C7492/A17219</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>C8162/A16892</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>BRC-1215-20014</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Maroni R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Offman J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sasieni P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walter FM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barnes J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scheibl F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rubin G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith SG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>BEST3 Consortium</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Debiram-Beecham I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Waller J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fitzgerald RC</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The BEST3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the Cytosponge-trefoil factor 3, a cell collection device coupled with the biomarker trefoil factor 3, as a tool for detecting Barrett's oesophagus, a precursor of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), in primary care. In this nested study, our aim was to understand patient experiences.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Mixed-methods using questionnaires (including Inventory to Assess Patient Satisfaction, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 and two-item perceived risk) and interviews.&lt;h4>Outcome measures&lt;/h4>Participant satisfaction, anxiety and perceived risk of developing OAC.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>General practices in England.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Patients with acid reflux enrolled in the intervention arm of the BEST3 trial and attendi</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-05T22:15:38.794Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T22:15:38.794Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8990713</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35393308</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054258</doi></cross_references></HashMap>