{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Chen W"],"funding":["Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China"],"pagination":["6159874"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8991401"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["2022"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Well known for its good anti-inflammatory effect, curcuma longa extract (CLE)/curcumin (C) has a potential effect on osteoarthritis (OA), and a large number of researchers have completed several systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) in this research area. However, the methodological and evidentiary quality of these SRs/MAs need to be further evaluated, and whether these findings provide reliable evidence for clinicians remains controversial.<h4>Methods</h4>Two researchers collected data from seven databases for SRs/MAs that are about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CLE/C for OA. Assessment was made for the SRs/MAs included in this article by means of the Assessment System for Evaluating Methodological Quality 2 (AMSTAR-2), the Risk of Bias in Systematic (ROBIS) scale, the list of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.<h4>Results</h4>Nine published SRs/MAs were included in our study. According to the results of the AMSTAR-2 assessment, only one SR/MA was assessed as high quality. According to the ROBIS evaluation results, only 2 SRs/MAs have a low risk of bias. According to the results of the PRISMA checklist assessment, only 2 SRs/MAs studies fully reported the checklist, while other studies had reporting flaws. According to GRADE, a total of 59 effect sizes extracted from the included SRs/MAs were evaluated, among which no effect size was rated as high.<h4>Conclusions</h4>CLE/C may be an effective and safe complementary treatment for OA. However, further standard SRs/MAs and RCTs are needed to provide an evidence-based medical rationale for this."],"journal":["Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM"],"pubmed_title":["Quality of Evidence Supporting the Role of Curcuma Longa Extract/Curcumin for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews."],"pmcid":["PMC8991401"],"funding_grant_id":["ZR2021MH2","2019-0234"],"pubmed_authors":["Yang Z","Qi L","Deng P","Chen W","Si G","Guo D","Shi H","Dong C","Liu W","Wang L"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Quality of Evidence Supporting the Role of Curcuma Longa Extract/Curcumin for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Well known for its good anti-inflammatory effect, curcuma longa extract (CLE)/curcumin (C) has a potential effect on osteoarthritis (OA), and a large number of researchers have completed several systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) in this research area. However, the methodological and evidentiary quality of these SRs/MAs need to be further evaluated, and whether these findings provide reliable evidence for clinicians remains controversial.<h4>Methods</h4>Two researchers collected data from seven databases for SRs/MAs that are about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CLE/C for OA. Assessment was made for the SRs/MAs included in this article by means of the Assessment System for Evaluating Methodological Quality 2 (AMSTAR-2), the Risk of Bias in Systematic (ROBIS) scale, the list of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.<h4>Results</h4>Nine published SRs/MAs were included in our study. According to the results of the AMSTAR-2 assessment, only one SR/MA was assessed as high quality. According to the ROBIS evaluation results, only 2 SRs/MAs have a low risk of bias. According to the results of the PRISMA checklist assessment, only 2 SRs/MAs studies fully reported the checklist, while other studies had reporting flaws. According to GRADE, a total of 59 effect sizes extracted from the included SRs/MAs were evaluated, among which no effect size was rated as high.<h4>Conclusions</h4>CLE/C may be an effective and safe complementary treatment for OA. However, further standard SRs/MAs and RCTs are needed to provide an evidence-based medical rationale for this.","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022","modification":"2025-04-04T07:35:05.125Z","creation":"2025-04-04T07:35:05.125Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC8991401","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35399636"],"doi":["10.1155/2022/6159874"]}}