<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10</volume><submitter>Liu Y</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>Purpose:&lt;/b> Endometrial thickness is one of the most important indicators in endometrial disease screening and diagnosis. Herein, we propose a method for automated measurement of endometrial thickness from transvaginal ultrasound images. &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> Accurate automated measurement of endometrial thickness relies on endometrium segmentation from transvaginal ultrasound images that usually have ambiguous boundaries and heterogeneous textures. Therefore, a two-step method was developed for automated measurement of endometrial thickness. First, a semantic segmentation method was developed based on deep learning, to segment the endometrium from 2D transvaginal ultrasound images. Second, we estimated endometrial thickness from the segmented results, using a largest inscribed circle searching method. Overall, 8,119 images (size: 852 × 1136 pixels) from 467 cases were used to train and validate the proposed method. &lt;b>Results:&lt;/b> We achieved an average Dice coefficient of 0.82 for endometrium segmentation using a validation dataset of 1,059 images from 71 cases. With validation using 3,210 images from 214 cases, 89.3% of endometrial thickness errors were within the clinically accepted range of ±2 mm. &lt;b>Conclusion:&lt;/b> Endometrial thickness can be automatically and accurately estimated from transvaginal ultrasound images for clinical screening and diagnosis.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology</journal><pagination>853845</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9001908</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Automatic Measurement of Endometrial Thickness From Transvaginal Ultrasound Images.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9001908</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Liu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jiang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peng B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weng W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fang L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Automatic Measurement of Endometrial Thickness From Transvaginal Ultrasound Images.</name><description>&lt;b>Purpose:&lt;/b> Endometrial thickness is one of the most important indicators in endometrial disease screening and diagnosis. Herein, we propose a method for automated measurement of endometrial thickness from transvaginal ultrasound images. &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> Accurate automated measurement of endometrial thickness relies on endometrium segmentation from transvaginal ultrasound images that usually have ambiguous boundaries and heterogeneous textures. Therefore, a two-step method was developed for automated measurement of endometrial thickness. First, a semantic segmentation method was developed based on deep learning, to segment the endometrium from 2D transvaginal ultrasound images. Second, we estimated endometrial thickness from the segmented results, using a largest inscribed circle searching method. Overall, 8,119 images (size: 852 × 1136 pixels) from 467 cases were used to train and validate the proposed method. &lt;b>Results:&lt;/b> We achieved an average Dice coefficient of 0.82 for endometrium segmentation using a validation dataset of 1,059 images from 71 cases. With validation using 3,210 images from 214 cases, 89.3% of endometrial thickness errors were within the clinically accepted range of ±2 mm. &lt;b>Conclusion:&lt;/b> Endometrial thickness can be automatically and accurately estimated from transvaginal ultrasound images for clinical screening and diagnosis.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-21T17:32:12.535Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T16:40:42.678Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9001908</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35425763</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fbioe.2022.853845</doi></cross_references></HashMap>