<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Ryan H</submitter><funding>Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs</funding><funding>European Research Council</funding><funding>John Fell Fund, University of Oxford</funding><funding>Possehl Foundation</funding><funding>Natural Environment Research Council</funding><funding>HS2 Ltd., Laing Murphy Joint Venture</funding><funding>Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council</funding><pagination>e0010312</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9022885</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Intestinal helminth parasites (worms) have afflicted humans throughout history and their eggs are readily detected in archaeological deposits including at locations where intestinal parasites are no longer considered endemic (e.g. the UK). Parasites provide valuable archaeological insights into historical health, sanitation, hygiene, dietary and culinary practices, as well as other factors. Differences in the prevalence of helminths over time may help us understand factors that affected the rate of infection of these parasites in past populations. While communal deposits often contain relatively high numbers of parasite eggs, these cannot be used to calculate prevalence rates, which are a key epidemiological measure of infection. The prevalence of intestinal helminths was investigated thro</pubmed_abstract><journal>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</journal><pubmed_title>Reconstructing the history of helminth prevalence in the UK.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9022885</pmcid><funding_grant_id>BB/N023803/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>BB/K004468/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ERC-2013-StG 337574-UNDEAD</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>337574</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>OD0221</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NE/K005243/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NE/H005269/1</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Smith AL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nicholson R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reeves B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loe L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Waldron T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guy C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kirchhelle C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ryan H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allison E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Larson G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walker D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Doriga IL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Flammer PG</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Reconstructing the history of helminth prevalence in the UK.</name><description>Intestinal helminth parasites (worms) have afflicted humans throughout history and their eggs are readily detected in archaeological deposits including at locations where intestinal parasites are no longer considered endemic (e.g. the UK). Parasites provide valuable archaeological insights into historical health, sanitation, hygiene, dietary and culinary practices, as well as other factors. Differences in the prevalence of helminths over time may help us understand factors that affected the rate of infection of these parasites in past populations. While communal deposits often contain relatively high numbers of parasite eggs, these cannot be used to calculate prevalence rates, which are a key epidemiological measure of infection. The prevalence of intestinal helminths was investigated thro</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-19T20:09:48.029Z</modification><creation>2024-12-04T00:38:17.405Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9022885</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35446843</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pntd.0010312</doi></cross_references></HashMap>