<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>O'Connell SP</submitter><funding>Movember Foundation</funding><funding>Federal Ministry of Education and Research</funding><funding>Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council</funding><pagination>1995</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9027643</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>There is a clinical need to improve assessment of biopsy-naïve patients for the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we investigated whether the robust integration of expression data from urinary extracellular vesicle RNA (EV-RNA) with urine proteomic metabolites can accurately predict PCa biopsy outcome. Urine samples collected within the Movember GAP1 Urine Biomarker study (n = 192) were analysed by both mass spectrometry-based urine-proteomics and NanoString gene-expression analysis (167 gene-probes). Cross-validated LASSO penalised regression and Random Forests identified a combination of clinical and urinary biomarkers for predictive modelling of significant disease (Gleason Score (Gs) ≥ 3 + 4). Four predictive models were developed: ‘MassSpec’ (CE-MS proteomics), ‘EV-RNA’, and ‘SoC’ (standard of care) clinical data models, alongside a fully integrated omics-model, deemed ‘ExoSpec’. ExoSpec (incorporating four gene transcripts, six peptides, and two clinical variables) is the best model for predicting Gs ≥ 3 + 4 at initial biopsy (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77−0.88) and is superior to a standard of care (SoC) model utilising clinical data alone (AUC = 0.71, p &lt; 0.001, 1000 resamples). As the ExoSpec Risk Score increases, the likelihood of higher-grade PCa on biopsy is significantly greater (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.1−3.7). The decision curve analyses reveals that ExoSpec provides a net benefit over SoC and could reduce unnecessary biopsies by 30%.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cancers</journal><pubmed_title>A Model to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer Integrating Urinary Peptide and Extracellular Vesicle RNA Data.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9027643</pmcid><funding_grant_id>E! 11023, Eurostars</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>BBS/E/T/000PR9819</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>GAP-1 Urine Biomarkers</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Clark J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salji M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brewer DS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Connell SP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pejchinovski M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cooper CS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mullen W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>On Behalf Of The Movember Gap Urine Biomarker Consortium</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Webb M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mischak H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Latosinska A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frantzi M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A Model to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer Integrating Urinary Peptide and Extracellular Vesicle RNA Data.</name><description>There is a clinical need to improve assessment of biopsy-naïve patients for the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we investigated whether the robust integration of expression data from urinary extracellular vesicle RNA (EV-RNA) with urine proteomic metabolites can accurately predict PCa biopsy outcome. Urine samples collected within the Movember GAP1 Urine Biomarker study (n = 192) were analysed by both mass spectrometry-based urine-proteomics and NanoString gene-expression analysis (167 gene-probes). Cross-validated LASSO penalised regression and Random Forests identified a combination of clinical and urinary biomarkers for predictive modelling of significant disease (Gleason Score (Gs) ≥ 3 + 4). Four predictive models were developed: ‘MassSpec’ (CE-MS proteomics), ‘EV-RNA’, and ‘SoC’ (standard of care) clinical data models, alongside a fully integrated omics-model, deemed ‘ExoSpec’. ExoSpec (incorporating four gene transcripts, six peptides, and two clinical variables) is the best model for predicting Gs ≥ 3 + 4 at initial biopsy (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77−0.88) and is superior to a standard of care (SoC) model utilising clinical data alone (AUC = 0.71, p &lt; 0.001, 1000 resamples). As the ExoSpec Risk Score increases, the likelihood of higher-grade PCa on biopsy is significantly greater (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.1−3.7). The decision curve analyses reveals that ExoSpec provides a net benefit over SoC and could reduce unnecessary biopsies by 30%.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-22T19:03:48.805Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T02:39:31.385Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9027643</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35454901</pubmed><doi>10.3390/cancers14081995</doi></cross_references></HashMap>