<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Seraphim A</submitter><funding>Intramural NIH HHS</funding><funding>British Heart Foundation</funding><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><pagination>1141-1151</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9034686</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>79(12)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery typically have complex coronary disease and remain at high risk of adverse events. Quantitative myocardial perfusion indices predict outcomes in native vessel disease, but their prognostic performance in patients with prior CABG is unknown.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>In this study, we sought to evaluate whether global stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR) derived from perfusion mapping cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) independently predict adverse outcomes in patients with prior CABG.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with prior CABG referred for adenosine stress perfusion CMR. Perfusion mapping was performed in-line with automated quantification of M</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</journal><pubmed_title>Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Predicts Outcomes in Patients With Prior Surgical Revascularization.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9034686</pmcid><funding_grant_id>Z99 HL999999</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ZIA HL006214</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CL-2019-19-004</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>FS/18/83/34025</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DRF-2014-07-008</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ZIA HL006242</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Moon JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Manisty C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rathod KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zaman S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Razvi Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Seraphim A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jones DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Knott KD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kellman P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cole G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davies R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dowsing B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fontana M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shiwani H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Johns I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Uppal R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xue H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Predicts Outcomes in Patients With Prior Surgical Revascularization.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery typically have complex coronary disease and remain at high risk of adverse events. Quantitative myocardial perfusion indices predict outcomes in native vessel disease, but their prognostic performance in patients with prior CABG is unknown.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>In this study, we sought to evaluate whether global stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR) derived from perfusion mapping cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) independently predict adverse outcomes in patients with prior CABG.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with prior CABG referred for adenosine stress perfusion CMR. Perfusion mapping was performed in-line with automated quantification of M</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-29T11:26:38.372Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T19:54:56.371Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9034686</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35331408</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.037</doi></cross_references></HashMap>