{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Blum M"],"funding":["NIA NIH HHS","National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","National Institute on Aging"],"pagination":["836237"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9035562"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["9"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Score-based survival prediction in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) is complicated. Easy-to-use prognostication tools could inform clinical decision-making and palliative care delivery.<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the prognostic utility of the Seattle HF model (SHFM), the surprise question (SQ), and the number of HF hospitalizations (NoH) within the last 12 months for predicting 1-year survival in patients with advanced HF.<h4>Methods</h4>We retrospectively analyzed data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial of advanced HF patients, predominantly with reduced ejection fraction. Primary outcome was the prognostic discrimination of SHFM, SQ (\"Would you be surprised if this patient were to die within 1 year?\") answered by HF cardiologists, and NoH, assessed by"],"journal":["Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine"],"pubmed_title":["Enhancing Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Through Simple Prognostication Tools: A Comparison of the Surprise Question, the Number of Previous Heart Failure Hospitalizations, and the Seattle Heart Failure Model for Predicting 1-Year Survival."],"pmcid":["PMC9035562"],"funding_grant_id":["K23AG049930","P30 AG028741","R01HL102084"],"pubmed_authors":["Gelfman LP","McKendrick K","Blum M","Pinney SP","Goldstein NE"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Enhancing Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Through Simple Prognostication Tools: A Comparison of the Surprise Question, the Number of Previous Heart Failure Hospitalizations, and the Seattle Heart Failure Model for Predicting 1-Year Survival.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Score-based survival prediction in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) is complicated. Easy-to-use prognostication tools could inform clinical decision-making and palliative care delivery.<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the prognostic utility of the Seattle HF model (SHFM), the surprise question (SQ), and the number of HF hospitalizations (NoH) within the last 12 months for predicting 1-year survival in patients with advanced HF.<h4>Methods</h4>We retrospectively analyzed data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial of advanced HF patients, predominantly with reduced ejection fraction. Primary outcome was the prognostic discrimination of SHFM, SQ (\"Would you be surprised if this patient were to die within 1 year?\") answered by HF cardiologists, and NoH, assessed by","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022","modification":"2025-04-20T00:18:10.483Z","creation":"2025-02-19T01:53:53.636Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9035562","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35479267"],"doi":["10.3389/fcvm.2022.836237"]}}