<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Ballard DH</submitter><funding>NIBIB NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>1890-1899</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9043030</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>55(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Although studies have described factors associated with failed magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), little is known about what factors influence usable elastography data.&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To identify factors that have a negative impact on percent measurable liver volume (pMLV), defined as the proportion of usable liver elastography data relative to the volume of imaged liver in patients undergoing MRE.&lt;h4>Study type&lt;/h4>Retrospective.&lt;h4>Subjects&lt;/h4>A total of 264 patients (n = 132 males, n = 132 females; mean age = 57 years) with suspected or known chronic liver disease underwent MRE paired with a liver protocol MRI.&lt;h4>Field strength/sequence&lt;/h4>MRE was performed on a single 1.5 T scanner using a two-dimensional gradient-recalled echo phase-contrast sequence with a p</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI</journal><pubmed_title>Quality Control of Magnetic Resonance Elastography Using Percent Measurable Liver Volume Estimation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9043030</pmcid><funding_grant_id>T32‐EB021955</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 EB021955</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Shetty AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ludwig DR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ballard DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fraum TJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Narra VR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salter A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Quality Control of Magnetic Resonance Elastography Using Percent Measurable Liver Volume Estimation.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Although studies have described factors associated with failed magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), little is known about what factors influence usable elastography data.&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To identify factors that have a negative impact on percent measurable liver volume (pMLV), defined as the proportion of usable liver elastography data relative to the volume of imaged liver in patients undergoing MRE.&lt;h4>Study type&lt;/h4>Retrospective.&lt;h4>Subjects&lt;/h4>A total of 264 patients (n = 132 males, n = 132 females; mean age = 57 years) with suspected or known chronic liver disease underwent MRE paired with a liver protocol MRI.&lt;h4>Field strength/sequence&lt;/h4>MRE was performed on a single 1.5 T scanner using a two-dimensional gradient-recalled echo phase-contrast sequence with a p</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-26T23:00:44.148Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T17:26:05.329Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9043030</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34704644</pubmed><doi>10.1002/jmri.27976</doi></cross_references></HashMap>