<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9</volume><submitter>Rocco PRM</submitter><funding>Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico</funding><funding>Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Nitazoxanide exerts antiviral activity &lt;i>in vitro&lt;/i> and &lt;i>in vivo&lt;/i> and anti-inflammatory effects, but its impact on patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia is uncertain.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 19 hospitals in Brazil. Hospitalized adult patients requiring supplemental oxygen, with COVID-19 symptoms and a chest computed tomography scan suggestive of viral pneumonia or positive RT-PCR test for COVID-19 were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive nitazoxanide (500 mg) or placebo, 3 times daily, for 5 days, and were followed for 14 days. The primary outcome was intensive care unit admission due to the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes included clinical</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in medicine</journal><pagination>844728</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9043450</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Nitazoxanide in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9043450</pmcid><pubmed_authors>da Silva JDG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barbosa LCV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fernandes APSM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caldeira DAF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haag F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fonseca FG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luiz RR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cabral AC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nogueira CMB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Buchele KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pelosi P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rocco PRM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morais S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Araujo-Filho JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Oliveira MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tierno PFGMM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sverdloff C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moura AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reis JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Junqueira AAF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rabello E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Silva RGF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cruz FF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mamede MMS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martins CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>da Costa LATJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lapa-E-Silva JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carajeleascow R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Junior JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Soares CRP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alvarenga PPM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Camargos VN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Felix NS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Franchini KG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mattos-Silva P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Silva PL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Avila RE</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Nitazoxanide in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Nitazoxanide exerts antiviral activity &lt;i>in vitro&lt;/i> and &lt;i>in vivo&lt;/i> and anti-inflammatory effects, but its impact on patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia is uncertain.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 19 hospitals in Brazil. Hospitalized adult patients requiring supplemental oxygen, with COVID-19 symptoms and a chest computed tomography scan suggestive of viral pneumonia or positive RT-PCR test for COVID-19 were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive nitazoxanide (500 mg) or placebo, 3 times daily, for 5 days, and were followed for 14 days. The primary outcome was intensive care unit admission due to the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes included clinical</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2026-04-08T13:21:06.895Z</modification><creation>2025-04-20T03:09:02.123Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9043450</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35492335</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fmed.2022.844728</doi></cross_references></HashMap>