{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Brambila C"],"funding":["Innovate UK","Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council"],"pagination":["5288-5298"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9044506"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["10(16)"],"pubmed_abstract":["To answer questions surrounding the sustainability of silica production, MilliporeSigma's DOZN 2.0 Green Chemistry Evaluator was employed as it provides quantitative values based on the 12 principles of Green Chemistry. As a first study using DOZN 2.0 to evaluate the greenness of nanomaterials, a range of silica types were considered and their greenness scores compared. These included low- and high-value silicas, both commercial and emerging, such as precipitated, gel, fumed, colloidal, mesoporous, and bioinspired silicas. When surveying these different types of silicas, it became clear that while low value silicas have excellent greenness scores, high-value silicas perform poorly on this scale. This highlighted the tension between high-value silicas that are desired for emerging markets a"],"journal":["ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering"],"pubmed_title":["A Comparison of Environmental Impact of Various Silicas Using a Green Chemistry Evaluator."],"pmcid":["PMC9044506"],"funding_grant_id":["EP/V051458/1","EP/P006892/1","EP/R025983/1"],"pubmed_authors":["Vetter C","Sharma P","Patwardhan SV","Keegan A","Boyd P","Ponnusamy E","Brambila C"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"A Comparison of Environmental Impact of Various Silicas Using a Green Chemistry Evaluator.","description":"To answer questions surrounding the sustainability of silica production, MilliporeSigma's DOZN 2.0 Green Chemistry Evaluator was employed as it provides quantitative values based on the 12 principles of Green Chemistry. As a first study using DOZN 2.0 to evaluate the greenness of nanomaterials, a range of silica types were considered and their greenness scores compared. These included low- and high-value silicas, both commercial and emerging, such as precipitated, gel, fumed, colloidal, mesoporous, and bioinspired silicas. When surveying these different types of silicas, it became clear that while low value silicas have excellent greenness scores, high-value silicas perform poorly on this scale. This highlighted the tension between high-value silicas that are desired for emerging markets a","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Apr","modification":"2025-04-19T00:42:00.031Z","creation":"2025-04-07T11:44:10.488Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9044506","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35493693"],"doi":["10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c00519"]}}