<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Topazian RJ</submitter><funding>NIOSH CDC HHS</funding><pagination>869</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9058736</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>22(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>To examine the relationship between civic association participation and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly whether different forms of engagement mitigate the increased rates of psychological distress throughout 2020.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Panel survey data collected from a nationally representative cohort of 1222 U.S. adults. Data was collected in three waves in April, July, and November 2020. Psychological distress was measured using the validated Kessler-6 instrument in November 2020.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Respondents belonging to political associations were more likely to experience psychological distress (difference in predicted level of psychological distress on a 0-1 scale: 0.098, p ≤ .05) relative to those in unknown associations. However, individuals in political associations who more frequently interacted with others had lower levels of psychological distress (-.065, p ≤ .05) compared to those in political associations with less frequent interactions.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Civic engagement that facilitates interpersonal interactions may protect against psychological distress.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC public health</journal><pubmed_title>Civic engagement and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9058736</pmcid><funding_grant_id>T42 OH008428</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Topazian RJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Han H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McGinty EE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Levine AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barry CL</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Civic engagement and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>To examine the relationship between civic association participation and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly whether different forms of engagement mitigate the increased rates of psychological distress throughout 2020.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Panel survey data collected from a nationally representative cohort of 1222 U.S. adults. Data was collected in three waves in April, July, and November 2020. Psychological distress was measured using the validated Kessler-6 instrument in November 2020.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Respondents belonging to political associations were more likely to experience psychological distress (difference in predicted level of psychological distress on a 0-1 scale: 0.098, p ≤ .05) relative to those in unknown associations. However, individuals in political associations who more frequently interacted with others had lower levels of psychological distress (-.065, p ≤ .05) compared to those in political associations with less frequent interactions.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Civic engagement that facilitates interpersonal interactions may protect against psychological distress.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 May</publication><modification>2024-11-14T00:18:04.041Z</modification><creation>2024-11-14T00:18:04.041Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9058736</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35501842</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12889-022-13289-4</doi></cross_references></HashMap>