<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Rao BR</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>AHRQ HHS</funding><pagination>622-629</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9060309</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>49(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Shared decision-making has become a new focus of health policy. Though its core elements are largely agreed upon, there is little consensus regarding which outcomes to prioritize for policy-mandated shared decision-making.</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Journal of law, medicine &amp; ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine &amp; Ethics</journal><pubmed_title>Shared Decision-Making for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Policy Goals, Metrics, and Challenges.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9060309</pmcid><funding_grant_id>TL1 TR002382</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR002378</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>F32 HS028558</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Howard DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rao BR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dickert NW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Merchant FM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matlock D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Shared Decision-Making for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Policy Goals, Metrics, and Challenges.</name><description>Shared decision-making has become a new focus of health policy. Though its core elements are largely agreed upon, there is little consensus regarding which outcomes to prioritize for policy-mandated shared decision-making.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021</publication><modification>2025-05-18T12:04:03.472Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T20:38:31.322Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9060309</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35006064</pubmed><doi>10.1017/jme.2021.85</doi></cross_references></HashMap>