<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Lazow MA</submitter><funding>The Gold Hope Project</funding><funding>Reflections Of Grace</funding><funding>Cure Brain Cancer</funding><funding>Ryan’s Hope</funding><funding>Laurie’s Love Foundation</funding><funding>AHRQ HHS</funding><funding>Whitley’s Wishes</funding><funding>Keris Kares</funding><funding>Love Chloe Foundation</funding><funding>Storm the Heavens Fund</funding><funding>The Cure Starts Now Australia</funding><funding>Lily Larue Foundation</funding><funding>The Isabella and Marcus Foundation</funding><funding>Snapgrant.com</funding><funding>The DIPG Collaborative</funding><funding>Pray Hope Believe</funding><funding>Aidan’s Avengers</funding><funding>Wayland Villars Foundation</funding><funding>Marlee’s Mission</funding><funding>RUN DIPG</funding><funding>American Childhood Cancer Organization</funding><funding>Robert Connor Dawes Foundation</funding><funding>the Kyler Strong Foundation</funding><funding>Benny’s World</funding><funding>Aubreigh’s Army</funding><funding>Musella Foundation</funding><funding>Austin Strong</funding><funding>Brooke Healey Foundation</funding><funding>Lauren’s Fight for Cure</funding><funding>Jeffrey Thomas Hayden Foundation</funding><funding>The Cure Starts Now Foundation</funding><funding>Gabriella’s Smile Foundation</funding><pagination>821-833</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9071293</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) remains a clinico-radiologic diagnosis without routine tissue acquisition. Reliable imaging distinction between DIPG and other pontine tumors with potentially more favorable prognoses and treatment considerations is essential.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Cases submitted to the International DIPG registry (IDIPGR) with histopathologic and/or radiologic data were analyzed. Central imaging review was performed on diagnostic brain MRIs (if available) by two neuro-radiologists. Imaging features suggestive of alternative diagnoses included nonpontine origin, &lt;50% pontine involvement, focally exophytic morphology, sharply defined margins, and/or marked diffusion restriction throughout.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among 286 patients with pathology from biopsy and/o</pubmed_abstract><journal>Neuro-oncology</journal><pubmed_title>Accuracy of central neuro-imaging review of DIPG compared with histopathology in the International DIPG Registry.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9071293</pmcid><funding_grant_id>K12 HS026390</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Cooney TM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El-Ayadi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kilburn L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sandler ES</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Packer R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fuller C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wagner LM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ziegler DS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gururangan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bandopadhayay P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cheng S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Minturn JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zaghloul M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bartels U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leary SE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gottardo N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Monje-Deisseroth M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lane A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El-Sheikh A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greiner RJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goldman S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jones BV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hansford JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dholaria H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leach JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dorris K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DeWire M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cohen KJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coven SL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Black K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bouffet E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Samson Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tinkle CL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fisher PG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hawkins C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Drissi R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sevlever G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia Lombardi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lazow MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fouladi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chaney B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koschmann C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fonseca A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hassall T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ma J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diez B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tsui K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Asher A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Accuracy of central neuro-imaging review of DIPG compared with histopathology in the International DIPG Registry.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) remains a clinico-radiologic diagnosis without routine tissue acquisition. Reliable imaging distinction between DIPG and other pontine tumors with potentially more favorable prognoses and treatment considerations is essential.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Cases submitted to the International DIPG registry (IDIPGR) with histopathologic and/or radiologic data were analyzed. Central imaging review was performed on diagnostic brain MRIs (if available) by two neuro-radiologists. Imaging features suggestive of alternative diagnoses included nonpontine origin, &lt;50% pontine involvement, focally exophytic morphology, sharply defined margins, and/or marked diffusion restriction throughout.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among 286 patients with pathology from biopsy and/o</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 May</publication><modification>2025-04-04T07:13:31.097Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T07:13:31.097Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9071293</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34668975</pubmed><doi>10.1093/neuonc/noab245</doi></cross_references></HashMap>