<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>4(5)</volume><submitter>Tella A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Rationale &amp; objective&lt;/h4>There is conflicting evidence regarding the type of β-blockers to use in dialysis patients. This systematic review seeks to determine whether highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with higher rates of cardiovascular events and mortality in hemodialysis patients than poorly dialyzable β-blockers.&lt;h4>Study design&lt;/h4>A systematic review of the existing literature was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed using data from the selected studies.&lt;h4>Setting &amp; study populations&lt;/h4>Participants were from the United States, Canada, and Taiwan. The mean ages of participants ranged from 55.9-75.7 years.&lt;h4>Selection criteria for studies&lt;/h4>We searched the Ovid MEDLINE database from 1990 to September 2020. Studies without adult hemodialysis participants and without comparisons of at least 2 β-blockers of different dialyzability were excluded.&lt;h4>Data extraction&lt;/h4>Baseline and adjusted outcome data were extracted from each study.&lt;h4>Analytical approach&lt;/h4>Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios using fully adjusted models from individual studies.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Four cohort studies were included. Pooling fully adjusted models, highly dialyzable β-blockers did not influence mortality (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.08; I&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 0.84) compared with poorly dialyzable β-blockers but were associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 0.35). Only 1 study reported on adverse events. Intradialytic hypotension was more common in those on carvedilol (a poorly dialyzable β-blocker) compared with those on metoprolol (a highly dialyzable β-blocker; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11).&lt;h4>Limitations&lt;/h4>No randomized controlled trials were identified. Each study used different analytic methods and different definitions for outcomes. Classifications of β-blockers varied. Only 1 study reported on adverse events.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Pooled data suggest highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with similar mortality events and fewer cardiovascular events compared with poorly dialyzable β-blockers.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Kidney medicine</journal><pagination>100460</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9079357</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>β-Blocker Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9079357</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Vang W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tella A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raju S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ishani A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ikeri E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Taylor O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mazanec M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>β-Blocker Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review.</name><description>&lt;h4>Rationale &amp; objective&lt;/h4>There is conflicting evidence regarding the type of β-blockers to use in dialysis patients. This systematic review seeks to determine whether highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with higher rates of cardiovascular events and mortality in hemodialysis patients than poorly dialyzable β-blockers.&lt;h4>Study design&lt;/h4>A systematic review of the existing literature was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed using data from the selected studies.&lt;h4>Setting &amp; study populations&lt;/h4>Participants were from the United States, Canada, and Taiwan. The mean ages of participants ranged from 55.9-75.7 years.&lt;h4>Selection criteria for studies&lt;/h4>We searched the Ovid MEDLINE database from 1990 to September 2020. Studies without adult hemodialysis participants and without comparisons of at least 2 β-blockers of different dialyzability were excluded.&lt;h4>Data extraction&lt;/h4>Baseline and adjusted outcome data were extracted from each study.&lt;h4>Analytical approach&lt;/h4>Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios using fully adjusted models from individual studies.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Four cohort studies were included. Pooling fully adjusted models, highly dialyzable β-blockers did not influence mortality (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.08; I&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 0.84) compared with poorly dialyzable β-blockers but were associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 0.35). Only 1 study reported on adverse events. Intradialytic hypotension was more common in those on carvedilol (a poorly dialyzable β-blocker) compared with those on metoprolol (a highly dialyzable β-blocker; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11).&lt;h4>Limitations&lt;/h4>No randomized controlled trials were identified. Each study used different analytic methods and different definitions for outcomes. Classifications of β-blockers varied. Only 1 study reported on adverse events.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Pooled data suggest highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with similar mortality events and fewer cardiovascular events compared with poorly dialyzable β-blockers.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 May</publication><modification>2025-04-04T09:10:11.186Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T03:24:26.735Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9079357</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35539430</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100460</doi></cross_references></HashMap>