<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zhang Z</submitter><funding>Chinese Academy of Sciences</funding><funding>Scientific Research and Technology Development Program of Guangxi</funding><funding>Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan</funding><funding>Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation</funding><pagination>nwab200</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9084358</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Atmospheric methane (CH&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub>) concentrations have shown a puzzling resumption in growth since 2007 following a period of stabilization from 2000 to 2006. Multiple hypotheses have been proposed to explain the temporal variations in CH&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> growth, and attribute the rise of atmospheric CH&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> either to increases in emissions from fossil fuel activities, agriculture and natural wetlands, or to a decrease in the atmospheric chemical sink. Here, we use a comprehensive ensemble of CH&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> source estimates and isotopic δ&lt;sup>13&lt;/sup>C-CH&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> source signature data to show that the resumption of CH&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> growth is most likely due to increased anthropogenic emissions. Our emission scenarios that have the fewest biases with respect to isotopic composition su</pubmed_abstract><journal>National science review</journal><pubmed_title>Anthropogenic emission is the main contributor to the rise of atmospheric methane during 1993-2017.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9084358</pmcid><funding_grant_id>XDA19040504</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>JPMEERF20182002</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>XDA19070204</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>GBMF5439</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Feinberg A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Knox S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saunois M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huang C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ganesan A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stavert A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hurtt G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fluet-Chouinard E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chatterjee A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bousquet P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hugelius G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McNicol G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Poulter B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patra PK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jackson RB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoglund-Isaksson L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Canadell JG</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Anthropogenic emission is the main contributor to the rise of atmospheric methane during 1993-2017.</name><description>Atmospheric methane (CH&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub>) concentrations have shown a puzzling resumption in growth since 2007 following a period of stabilization from 2000 to 2006. Multiple hypotheses have been proposed to explain the temporal variations in CH&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> growth, and attribute the rise of atmospheric CH&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> either to increases in emissions from fossil fuel activities, agriculture and natural wetlands, or to a decrease in the atmospheric chemical sink. Here, we use a comprehensive ensemble of CH&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> source estimates and isotopic δ&lt;sup>13&lt;/sup>C-CH&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> source signature data to show that the resumption of CH&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> growth is most likely due to increased anthropogenic emissions. Our emission scenarios that have the fewest biases with respect to isotopic composition su</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 May</publication><modification>2025-04-19T21:43:56.871Z</modification><creation>2022-07-09T15:52:19.885Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9084358</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35547958</pubmed><doi>10.1093/nsr/nwab200</doi></cross_references></HashMap>