<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Yang HJ</submitter><funding>Korea Health Industry Development Institute</funding><pagination>3686-3697</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9085673</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>36(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There have been concerns over the long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (UD EGC). We aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for patients with UD EGC.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through March 2021 to identify studies that compared the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for UD EGC meeting expanded criteria for curative resection. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool for non-randomized studies. The risk ratio (RR) was estimated using a fixed-effect model.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Overall, 1863 patients from five retrospective cohort studies, including 908 patients with propensity score matching (PSM), were eligible for meta-analys</pubmed_abstract><journal>Surgical endoscopy</journal><pubmed_title>Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer meeting the expanded criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9085673</pmcid><funding_grant_id>HI19C0481</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HC20C0123</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Choi IJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang HJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim NW</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer meeting the expanded criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There have been concerns over the long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (UD EGC). We aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for patients with UD EGC.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through March 2021 to identify studies that compared the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for UD EGC meeting expanded criteria for curative resection. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool for non-randomized studies. The risk ratio (RR) was estimated using a fixed-effect model.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Overall, 1863 patients from five retrospective cohort studies, including 908 patients with propensity score matching (PSM), were eligible for meta-analys</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-22T03:48:03.197Z</modification><creation>2024-11-15T13:04:43.877Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9085673</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35194664</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00464-022-09126-9</doi></cross_references></HashMap>