<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>50(4)</volume><submitter>Bauer A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Clinical research has faced new challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to excessive operational demands affecting all stakeholders. We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on clinical research strategies and compared different adaptations by regulatory bodies and academic research institutions in a global context, exploring what can be learned for possible future pandemics.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a cross-sectional online survey and identified and assessed different COVID-19-specific adaptation strategies used by academic research institutions and regulatory bodies.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>All 19 participating academic research institutions developed and followed similar strategies, including preventive measures, manpower recruitment, and prioritisation of COVID-19 proje</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Journal of international medical research</journal><pagination>3000605221093179</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9087250</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>How COVID-19 changed clinical research strategies: a global survey.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9087250</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Uresin Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eberle D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stockley L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bauer A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yau H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grossmann R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ntekim A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eskat A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sen S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Egert-Schwender S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Medina Redondo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hedayati E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tay F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>How COVID-19 changed clinical research strategies: a global survey.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Clinical research has faced new challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to excessive operational demands affecting all stakeholders. We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on clinical research strategies and compared different adaptations by regulatory bodies and academic research institutions in a global context, exploring what can be learned for possible future pandemics.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a cross-sectional online survey and identified and assessed different COVID-19-specific adaptation strategies used by academic research institutions and regulatory bodies.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>All 19 participating academic research institutions developed and followed similar strategies, including preventive measures, manpower recruitment, and prioritisation of COVID-19 proje</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-04T07:32:40.377Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T07:32:40.377Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9087250</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35469473</pubmed><doi>10.1177/03000605221093179</doi></cross_references></HashMap>