<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11(9)</volume><submitter>Tanaka A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Liberation from mechanical ventilation is of great importance owing to related complications from extended ventilation time. In this prospective multicenter study, we aimed to construct a versatile model for predicting extubation outcomes in critical care settings using obtainable physiological predictors. The study included patients who had been extubated after a successful 30 min spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to predict extubation outcomes (successful extubation without reintubation and uneventful extubation without reintubation or noninvasive respiratory support) using eight parameters: age, heart failure, respiratory disease, rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), PaO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>/FIO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>, Glasgow Coma Scale score, fluid balance, and endotracheal suctioning episodes. Of 499 patients, 453 (90.8%) and 328 (65.7%) achieved successful and uneventful extubation, respectively. The areas under the curve for successful and uneventful extubation in the novel prediction model were 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62-0.77) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.74), respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the conventional model solely using RSBI (0.58 (95% CI, 0.50-0.66) and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.49-0.60), &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.004 and &amp;lt;0.001, respectively). The model was validated using a bootstrap method, and an online application was developed for automatic calculation. Our model, which is based on a combination of generally obtainable parameters, established an accessible method for predicting extubation outcomes after a successful SBT.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical medicine</journal><pagination>2520</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9102390</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Prediction Model of Extubation Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9102390</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kosaka J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fujino Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shintani A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kotake Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maki Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mizobuchi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Egi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tanaka A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Uchiyama A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morimatsu H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hirao O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kabata D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Furushima N</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Prediction Model of Extubation Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.</name><description>Liberation from mechanical ventilation is of great importance owing to related complications from extended ventilation time. In this prospective multicenter study, we aimed to construct a versatile model for predicting extubation outcomes in critical care settings using obtainable physiological predictors. The study included patients who had been extubated after a successful 30 min spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to predict extubation outcomes (successful extubation without reintubation and uneventful extubation without reintubation or noninvasive respiratory support) using eight parameters: age, heart failure, respiratory disease, rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), PaO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>/FIO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>, Glasgow Coma Scale score, fluid balance, and endotracheal suctioning episodes. Of 499 patients, 453 (90.8%) and 328 (65.7%) achieved successful and uneventful extubation, respectively. The areas under the curve for successful and uneventful extubation in the novel prediction model were 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62-0.77) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.74), respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the conventional model solely using RSBI (0.58 (95% CI, 0.50-0.66) and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.49-0.60), &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.004 and &amp;lt;0.001, respectively). The model was validated using a bootstrap method, and an online application was developed for automatic calculation. Our model, which is based on a combination of generally obtainable parameters, established an accessible method for predicting extubation outcomes after a successful SBT.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-19T16:19:26.228Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T16:19:26.228Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9102390</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35566646</pubmed><doi>10.3390/jcm11092520</doi></cross_references></HashMap>