<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>54(1)</volume><submitter>Allan-Blitz LT</submitter><funding>the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Internal Medicine Residency Martin P. Solomon Scholars Fund</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Mentorship increases trainee productivity, promotes career satisfaction and reduces burnout. Beginning in 2016, our Medicine-Paediatrics residency program developed and implemented a longitudinal mentorship curriculum among trainees. We report initial experiences with that program and discuss potential future directions.&lt;h4>Curriculum structure and method of implementation&lt;/h4>We implemented and adapted a peer mentorship model and expanded it to include guest lectures and workshops centred around 13 core topics. Our expanded model included five longitudinal components: (1) peer mentorship; (2) virtual check-ins with residency leadership; (3) focussed didactics and workshops; (4) small-group dinners highlighting different career paths; and (5) dedicated faculty who pair residents with mentors based on common interests. We compared annual survey results on resident satisfaction with program mentorship, using chi-square and fisher's exact tests to assess statistically significant differences pre- (2012-2016) and post-intervention (2016-2020).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We analysed 112 responses with annual response rate varying between 41.2% and 100%. Overall satisfaction with mentorship improved from 57.6% to 73.4% (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = .53), satisfaction with emotional support improved from 63.1% to 71.6% (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = .21), and satisfaction with career-specific mentorship improved from 48.5% to 59.5% (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = .70). Residents reported consistently high satisfaction with peer mentorship (77.8%-100%). The percent of residents reporting they had identified a career mentor increased from 60.0% in 2017 to 88.9% in 2019, which was sustained at 90.0% in 2020.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>We report our experience in implementing and adapting a mentorship curriculum for resident physicians in a single training program, including transitioning to a primarily online-based platform at the outset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Our results showed a trend towards improvement in resident satisfaction with overall and career-specific mentorship, as well as improved emotional support. Future work is needed using more objective outcome markers among a larger and more diverse group of residents. KEY MESSAGESAmong resident physicians in a single training program, a mix of mentor-mentee dyads, group-based peer mentoring and a structured curriculum has shown promise in improving resident-reported satisfaction with programmatic mentorshipWhile we attempted to adapt the mentorship curriculum to an online platform with the development of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, reported satisfaction in overall mentorship and emotional support decreased in comparison to the prior year, an important focus for future work.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Annals of medicine</journal><pagination>1313-1319</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9103397</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Implementation and first experiences with a multimodal mentorship curriculum for medicine-paediatrics residents.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9103397</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Sharma N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Valtis Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Petersen E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cuneo CN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sundberg M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allan-Blitz LT</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Implementation and first experiences with a multimodal mentorship curriculum for medicine-paediatrics residents.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Mentorship increases trainee productivity, promotes career satisfaction and reduces burnout. Beginning in 2016, our Medicine-Paediatrics residency program developed and implemented a longitudinal mentorship curriculum among trainees. We report initial experiences with that program and discuss potential future directions.&lt;h4>Curriculum structure and method of implementation&lt;/h4>We implemented and adapted a peer mentorship model and expanded it to include guest lectures and workshops centred around 13 core topics. Our expanded model included five longitudinal components: (1) peer mentorship; (2) virtual check-ins with residency leadership; (3) focussed didactics and workshops; (4) small-group dinners highlighting different career paths; and (5) dedicated faculty who pair residents with mentors based on common interests. We compared annual survey results on resident satisfaction with program mentorship, using chi-square and fisher's exact tests to assess statistically significant differences pre- (2012-2016) and post-intervention (2016-2020).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We analysed 112 responses with annual response rate varying between 41.2% and 100%. Overall satisfaction with mentorship improved from 57.6% to 73.4% (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = .53), satisfaction with emotional support improved from 63.1% to 71.6% (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = .21), and satisfaction with career-specific mentorship improved from 48.5% to 59.5% (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = .70). Residents reported consistently high satisfaction with peer mentorship (77.8%-100%). The percent of residents reporting they had identified a career mentor increased from 60.0% in 2017 to 88.9% in 2019, which was sustained at 90.0% in 2020.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>We report our experience in implementing and adapting a mentorship curriculum for resident physicians in a single training program, including transitioning to a primarily online-based platform at the outset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Our results showed a trend towards improvement in resident satisfaction with overall and career-specific mentorship, as well as improved emotional support. Future work is needed using more objective outcome markers among a larger and more diverse group of residents. KEY MESSAGESAmong resident physicians in a single training program, a mix of mentor-mentee dyads, group-based peer mentoring and a structured curriculum has shown promise in improving resident-reported satisfaction with programmatic mentorshipWhile we attempted to adapt the mentorship curriculum to an online platform with the development of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, reported satisfaction in overall mentorship and emotional support decreased in comparison to the prior year, an important focus for future work.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-18T17:07:21.185Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T00:56:26.652Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9103397</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35543194</pubmed><doi>10.1080/07853890.2022.2070661</doi></cross_references></HashMap>